Ep 22. How curiosity and networks can drive your career

I am joined today by Alex Condolean, MD, who is the Vice President (USA), of the Virtual Healthcare Franchise – at Sanofi (the French and global top ten global healthcare company). Alex is based out of Boston, USA.
 
In this wide-ranging conversation we discuss:
  • Alex’s reason for becoming a Medical doctor and then leaving the clinical world for a commercial one
  • What a Medical Director actually does
  • When he first realised he had to learn leadership
  • Moving from the brash, arrogant version of himself to the person he is today
  • Moving his family to China and the extraordinary experience that was
  • How maintaining his networks have expanded his career globally
  • The power of curiosity

and much more 

Show notes

Ep 21. Taking Kiwi style Leadership to the world!

Lance Little is the leader for Asia Pacific for one of the world’s largest and most successful health diagnostic company- Roche Diagnostics.
 
He hails from New Zealand which influences this conversation!
We discuss:
 
  • What is at the core of New Zealand heritage and how that influences leadership
  • What is a Marlboro man
  • Why the All Blacks are the most successful team ever
  • Leading in Thailand, India, Singapore and why learning the social culture is so important
  • His views on leading during Covid 19
  • How health diagnostics are providing a massive ROI for governments
  • How governments have managed their countries during Covid
  • and How Lance optimises his own health as a busy executive

Show notes

Links

Favourite song

Ep 20. Accept you are in charge, get over it and lead!

Richard Neall is the Group CEO of a range of very successful construction companies in the UK. In this very open and frank conversation he shares:
  • His own journey from a council worker to Group CEO
  • How he purposefully uses his native background as a source to learn from when he first moved to England
  • Getting promoted fast and fired publicly
  • The leader’s shadow and why we just need to accept when we are in charge, that we are in charge
  • Why he promotes young leaders early
  • The watch-outs for talent development
  • The liberty of having fun at work

Show notes

Transcript

Pod: Pod here

I’m joined by Richard Neil, who is the group chief exec of one group construction group of companies in the UK, which is a group of construction logistics. And other related industries held under a holding group called one group construction.

Richard was born in Western Sydney area called the blue mountains in Katoomba and lived there until his late twenties.

When he then moved to the UK, what his girlfriend, Peppa ,who later became his wife. We discuss his early days in his career in the UK. And after four years taken on his first MD /CEO role in a listed business. This was a major mistake. We discussed why it was mistake, why the culture of that organization did not suit him and is very public firing from that role.

One year later, however that led to an opportunity that arose, which led to him getting involved in a management buyout of his previous company, which is now where he is as the group chief executive officer.

We talk about culture. We talk about fun. We talk about staying healthy. We talk about the organization’s vision and mission for itself, which is happy people making money.

We talk about his notions of leadership, including if you are the boss, you’re always being watched as to do the right thing. More importantly, this is a conversation full of insights, fun, energy, and a bit of larrikin Aussie humor for someone working in the UK

A bit of disclosure here, Richard grew up in Katoomba where my wife grew up. They’d been lifelong friends and we discussed that relationship and how she put us together for this conversation. Thank you, Carole!

Richard:  On the front page of our construction news over here and all that sort of thing, and it was horrific, but it was brilliant. It was brilliant. It was exactly what I needed for an overconfident young guy. Who’d never got a wrong to have your heart ripped out publicly and to come home and to have your wife go… it’s okay….

Pod: Welcome to the leadership diet. I interview leaders and experts about ways to optimize leadership. What are useful habits and thinking patterns. What are the secrets to high-performance teams and how do they continue to nurture their effectiveness day after day? In other words, what is their leadership diet?

 

 

 

Welcome Richard, to this episode of the leadership diets. So great to see you

Now you’re the chief executive of the group chief exec rider of one group construction, which is a very successful privately owned construction organization in the UK with 20 offices, over 500 people and multiple different brands beneath the overarching brand.

And I want to jump to how you came into that organization through an MBO in a few minutes, cause that’s a very unusual way to end up in that role. But one of the things that we often do in this podcast is go back to the stories of origin and you, and I know each other through mutual friends and families in place called Katoomba and the blue mountains, Western of Sydney, where I knew you grew up in that area and your family was affectionately called a 10 pound Pom family.

And most of our listeners will have no idea who I’m talking about when I say that.

So let’s start there. What is a 10 pound pom family? And what was life like for you growing up in the blue mountains?

Richard: Well, a bit to cover there. Yeah. You’ll get me crying already in pod Katoomba was where I was born! Yeah.

That’s definitely home world listed area and all the rest of it. It makes it sound a bit Flesher than it probably was to be honest. But yeah, I was born up there. The 10 pound homework I’m questioning whether it’s 10 pounds or five pounds now, but that was my mom’s family. And basically back in the fifties, she came out and left from till redox, which ironically, we’ve done a bit of work over the years since.

Yeah, it’s really nice. And uh, they pulled the whole family up and they moved out there. As I say in the mid sixties. So yeah, that’s a 10 or five pound, whichever it is a hamam really. So yeah. I, you talk over here, you mentioned a poem and they look at you a little bit funny, but it’s, I mean, it

Pod: definitely affects you.

It’s a well-known term over here. And then my memory is, is of course I wasn’t in Australia at that time as my accent gives away. But the memory, the 10 pound was the cost of the fare to get from the UK to Australia. And it was. It was used predominantly for folks from the UK, as opposed to other countries, hence the 10 pound Palm butter.

I think, I think the historical settlement of Australia continued long after the convicts were sent out. And when we use those fairs to get more people out here to help settle it,

Richard: I think you’re exactly right. But I still play the convict card occasion here. They can

Pod: do my history. Do I have to have one to still get in

Richard: depending on what’s happening or I’ll either play the conflict card if we’re winning or I’ll actually remind people that yeah, you’d beat us in the world cup or whatever it is, but my mother was English.

My dad was born on the boat or conceived on the boat on the way out there. So I’m as English. So like most Aussies I’ll just play, which puts me in the best position.

Pod: Absolutely. I read an interview. You did a few years ago where you’re talking about your background in Australia and you talked about. That when you were young, your parents separated and you ended up living with your dad and some of your siblings live with your mom, which had a big impact in terms of how it shaped you and how you youth think of the world.

Can you tell us a bit about that and how that influenced you then? And I suspect it’s still mine today. It sounds

Richard: like you’ve been talking to my wife already. Yeah, definitely still influences me in a positive way now, but now my mum and dad split when I was eight and I had an older brother still, but a couple of years older than me and then two younger ones and they made the decision.

This was sort of mid I’m old now I’m mid seventies. So it was early days for people to get divorced. I remember in school, I was one of, I was the only one at my school who mum and dad were divorced, but within about five years, everyone

Pod: with the train continued,

Richard: but yeah, they, yeah, but they made, they made the decision to, to two of the boys, the two young ones to go with my mum and the two elder ones, myself and my older brother, Steve, to go with dad.

And yeah, I think we all still struggle with. Making sense out of that. And I think there’s been a lot of guilt built up on all sides, mainly my mom’s side, I guess, for letting that to happen, but what they did. And we’ll probably talk about it later. I think it’s the journey that shapes who you are and you sort of, you know, I think for me it ended up a positive.

I ended up having to pretty much look after myself. My dad always provided, but there wasn’t a lot of love in the house really is not a natural sort of soft person. My brother was rat bag. He got in lots of travel. So that made me look good, which was good, but it meant that you had to be pretty self-sufficient and, and I guess that shaped.

A positive side for me, I had to get off my entire life. I was going to do anything. The negative side is I certainly didn’t understand girls. I always had girlfriends, but I didn’t understand them because I didn’t have a mom in the house to say, no, no, no,

Pod: that’s not what you do. And say that you must see

Richard: that occasionally you can pick the, you can pick the older children and you can pick the ones who’ve been brought up by dad.

So my wife’s had a journey of. A hundred years, 30 years, whatever it’s been, it’s not quite 30 years of trying to shake me into it. She’s not there yet.

Pod: I think all of our wives say they’re shaping us into human beings and they always say, they’re not there yet. So don’t worry. You’re not alone. Richard. I think, you know, my wife, I think you might have to understand.

She would say that every now and again. Yeah. I think

Richard: you’re wise still shaping me

Pod: from before we jump into, you know, your arrival in the UK, in another interview, I read that you had done. Once you talked about a really important moment for you in the blue mountains, where you had started your engineering career.

I think you had already, I think you had a reply to an ad in the paper and went to Sydney university and started there, but you were in, you were dating a lady in Sydney who, uh, left you because you felt you weren’t going anywhere, wrote a harsh judgment, I suspect. But nonetheless, it seems to stimulate you in, into taking action about that.

Richard: Yes. Well, yeah, it’s true. As it sounds, we were very close to getting married and I loved it a bit. And like most younger company go on when I was 22, 23, I was a blue. I was oblivious to the fact that she didn’t quite lovely as much as I loved her, that the reason she gave me ended up being whether it was true or not.

I don’t know. But the reason she gave me she’d just started a career in, she became an accountant and she was doing well. And I was a council guy, as I say, I’d applied to a job in the paper and told them the only thing I’d ever wanted to be was an engineer. And I didn’t even know what an engineer was, but blank my way into this job.

And it was just because they hired me to go through university. So that was sort of nice. And I was sort of just plodding along and, and that was probably the kick I needed in a funny way. Probably the. Know, I probably would have liked from my family at some stage, but we were sort of left to sort of do our own thing really.

And that gave me a kick to say, well, you know, really, are you going to make anything in your life? Really? And I remember the next day I put a tie on the award title where we’ll put a tie on laughable now, but I put a tie on and went to work and I got serious about what I was doing. And I got over it fairly quickly, but I hung onto the pain for many years intentionally because I said, we’ll make this happen, but we will not prove somebody wrong.

Cause I still deep down, she was a lovely girl and I still hope she’s in a great place, but I made it a motivation for me for, for quite a long time,

Pod: really MC on, on this podcast and indeed in my home career where I interview leaders every single day, most leaders who are successful have a, a moment of humiliation of some kind that they hold on to as, as a memory to remind them of that event.

Plus it’s no longer painful. It sparked me to do something different than if I hadn’t done something different. I still be back there as opposed to where I am. So how do I not lose that learning? And it sounds like for you as being, it was a really awfully painful moment at the time, but it really changed your whole life in the sense of not just putting on a tie and changing your fashion, but actually changing your whole perspective.

And then in day that led you to, to England a couple years later,

Richard: looking back at your career and what’s happened, I guess you’d pull out individual bits that sort of make it make sense. If, if, if you, like, I think in reality, it’s probably a combination, but me and other things that will probably be more important, but as a soundbite that helps you put it in perspective.

And I had several issues like that. And probably the biggest one that in reality is meeting my wife, meeting in English girl. Who’s just still the most wonderful person in the world. And she had a massive influence on me as an individual and that. Yeah, that, that gave me a bedrock emotionally and as a human being that allowed me to go and do okay.

In the, in, on the, on the work side. Really. So that’s, that’s probably by far, far bigger influence, but yeah, some of the values and boy, we’ve had some events, some few, some of those failures career-wise has been massively influential and yeah, you’ve got to get it wrong. You have to get it wrong. It hurts.

But that’s the stuff that really gives you the leaps in terms of progress of how you can deal with things. But you

Pod: know, that better than I do. You mentioned Pippa. And at the head of this call, we were talking about, you know, the amount of Australians who go to UK and indeed the amount of folks in the UK who come to Australia.

And, and I, uh, am I right in remembering she was here in Australia, you met her here and then you guys went to UK couple years later.

Richard: Yeah. That’s exactly right. Yeah. She was tennis collection and she’d been playing a little tournament tennis and she took some time off to do some coaching out here. And how can you not play?

Typical Aussie score was really important. She was gorgeous. She was a tennis player. Yeah. The cast has died. We spent four or five years over here after getting married came back here, got married, went back to was that the game was always at some stage. We’ll spend a little bit of time in the UK and then we’ll decide where we’re going to live.

She decided, you know what? The answer

Pod: is

Richard: just an idiot. And that was 97. Yeah. We came out here and been here ever since and just, just loved it really, really, really happy over here.

Pod: So moving into the work fund, then you, you joined organization called Jackson partners through a contact. You had met previously in a previous excursion to the UK because they were a contract engineering company. Then you moved into a, I suppose like a business development type role for them. Uh, sort of kinda, it was

Richard: early days in contracting there a group of contracting businesses.

So they build things and I knocked on the door and I got along reasonably well with the guy who ran it. And there wasn’t, there was one content much to my disgust because I hate the idea of context and old school ties. But I did happen to know one guy who knew. This other guy, Peter Andrews. So yeah, completely hypocritical in terms of my uncomfortableness with, with context, but he gave me a shot and he gave me a, a, a, a low level job.

I’d had a pretty good joke with the council. So that was, that was difficult. Really. I felt like I was going backwards and there was some tears, but Pivotal’s a wonderful story about me crying out the front on my day, too, with Jackson’s. We standing with my little briefcase and being all upset because I thought my life was ended and my career was over.

But then he gave me a job in, it was the early days when you started bidding for work on with the quality submissions. So you had to prove not only that this was a sensible price, but what were you going to do and how are you going to perform this particular contract and where with the local community and all that sort of stuff.

So I was, I was given a chance to write some things. I wasn’t very good at it because we didn’t win every job. And I didn’t see the point in bidding work that we didn’t win. It was my stuff setting. So they quickly moved me on and I just kept putting my hand up to say, yeah, I’ll try that. I don’t know how that works, but I’ll have a go.

And that works quite well in most organizations because people

Pod: put their hand up. Yeah. Well, that’s an interesting comment to make. And I know I saw you, you said something similar in an interview elsewhere where you talked about curiosity is a core trait and therefore putting your hand up and having a go is a really core tenant of your own success.

What is it about having to go that, that you are able to do? And what was the lack of fear you have? I suppose in having to go? So that’s a very good question. I

Richard: guess it stems. Having now had a little insight into my, my past. I always had an underlying confidence if you like, and for me, that country sport, I was reasonably sporty.

I wasn’t particularly academic. I did. Okay. I forced myself to do okay. People like your wife were far brighter than me and still are, but I did. Okay. And sport was a good bedrock for the confidence that I came with. For me, I’ve always fought over confidence if anything, and I’m always quite self-critical because I hate the idea of being perceived as overconfidence.

But yeah, I’m pretty confident certain through, I’m not too scared of having to go as you put it, but there were definitely some moments when I came to the UK and I don’t know whether others in listening to this sort of. I don’t know whether it’s an imposter syndrome or whatever. I met some pretty high flyers when I came over here and I realized they weren’t very good.

That sounds, that sounds wrong. But I realized that I realized they weren’t as brilliant as I assumed you had to be, you be a high flyer. And that was, that was an important moment for me because I thought, you know what? I can live in this pond. You know, I might not be there yet, and I might not have the experience and whatnot, but the things like the internet around with being prepared to certainly be curious, ask questions, don’t be afraid.

You can have a pretty good go. And if you, if you underpin that in my, in my. The way I teach I’m a planner. I have to be organized. If I say I’m going to do something, you know, it happens. And if you’re pretty organized and your project management skills are pretty tight and you actually do what you say you’re going to do, and you’re prepared to put your hand up in my experience in, in the businesses I’ve worked with you, you go up the ladder pretty quickly, because most of the ones at the top of that lack some of those skills, or even if it’s just there, they’re not that good at getting stuff done.

Whereas I, I can get stuff done.

Pod: My mentors years ago said to me that when you’re looking at folks in, in executive levels of leadership, typically the balance between confidence and competence is out of balance. The folks who have got more confidence than competence tend to be promoted for are faster than the folks got more competence than confidence.

So I look for the ones who look more confident and follow them. And I think that goes to what you just said.

Richard: Yeah. I think, and, and fake it to make it, whatever that expression is. I think you grow into your own shoes, but you know, and I’m sure I speak more to talk a little bit later about this old guy have become, but after a while, you can just do it and you find yourself not needing to be as brave on the outside because you actually sorta know the answer before you start, but that comes with experience and it comes with making, you know, having got a lot of things wrong over the years, but yeah, I D I just, when, when we came to the UK in particular, I’d gone, gone backwards in a big way.

And I just thought, well, I’ve got nothing to lose. And I got myself organized. I documented every person I met. I said to them who they were, where their families came from. I, I didn’t understand any businesses. So a lot of work research on businesses and I played the Aussie card regularly. I would say, look, I don’t know how this works over here, because I’m a foreigner.

Can you explain it to me? And, and, and I’ve kept that my whole life. And, you know, I, I love just asking people about how things work, you know, whether that’s them personally or their business.

Pod: I find it fascinating to be foreigner. It goes to a peer to me. I don’t know how this works. I’m a foreigner. Can you please tell me?

Yeah.

Richard: Now that I don’t even sound Australian anymore, it gets harder, but yeah, not, not so much, but yeah, the habit of a lifetime and yeah, I just find myself and as I say, if we were just having more general chat, you would be good being grilled. And I wouldn’t be deflecting every question because that’s,

you’re far more interesting than me and I use that. I use that a lot, but that’s just who I am. I’m just that person. And you know, if people really try, I’ll let them, I’ll let them in a little bit, but I just don’t think I’m particularly

Pod: interesting. There’s something you sent me. I know you do say when you are working with young engineers or you’re doing presentations and I read it jumped out at me, but when I read it and that is be confident enough to take advice from anyone.

I love the juxtaposition between be confident and taking advice. Cause it kind of a, an irony that sits with that yet my own experiences, folks who are really, really confident themselves are very, very happy to take advice. And it kind of goes to what you just said about asking questions yet. I’m my experience.

My experience is a lot of leaders want to show up knowing as if they know the answers and then therefore they are less open for other people’s perspectives. But what you are saying is the opposite. Be very confident in asking for advice and therefore multiple perspectives completely,

Richard: completely, I guess, where that comes from in my regard, I’m a bit of a reluctant.

I don’t think you can sign it eras we’ve been in, in a relative way being re relatively successful. We’re happy. We’re healthy with we’ve got nice stuff. And however you want to measure that it’s worked out really well in terms of work. You know, I’ve been in a senior position for sort of ever our first, I was running a business, a reasonably large business before our management buyer first buyout in 2004.

So for the last 20 odd years, I’ve been in a pretty senior position. So I’ve been the boss for long enough that it doesn’t matter anymore. You are the boss and you act like the boss and you, when you go to events, when you go to places, when you sit in meetings, when you talk to people, you are that person already.

So the smart thing to do is not need to be the boss because you are already, and you have got more experience and you have, you have got a way of looking for things and you’ve got that weird wisdom thing. And I don’t know where that came from, but you’ve sort of got that. And so the one thing you definitely don’t need to do is be the one.

And I find that that disrupts the landscape terrifically because people go, Oh, this person is prepared to listen. You know, I can’t be out a lot of what I say was the water. What do I know? But from my perspective, it feels like something like this, what are you guys thinking about this? And that’s quite disarming, but it also changes the whole dynamic and the businesses I’m involved with.

Don’t have hierarchies, don’t have, I’ll make the call. I’ll always make the call, but it’s after we’ve had the discussion, we’ve heard what people really think. And I know you’ve worked in America and work with that side of the pond. I feel uncomfortable in that sort of world where people sort of jump in mind as they tell the boss, whatever he wants to hear and then walk out a meeting again.

Yeah, God,

That was stupid. I feel is not the boss’s or Chair of any meeting or as a more senior person in any environment, you are duty bound to actually make sure that people can actually have an opinion because that’s the engine room. That’s where the smart stuff’s going on. All you’re doing is sort of shoving it all together in a, in a way that actually means you get some results out of this at the end.

But yeah, feel very strongly about that. Don’t don’t be the boss. You

Pod: are in it. There, there, there is a beautiful wisdom in what you just said, and I’m going to jump to this too. I was going to come this later on, but you you’ve dumped it already. The thing that really jumped out at me, when I read some of the presentations you make to young engineers is you are always being watched.

So always do the right thing. And the work that I do, many leaders who become the most senior leader in their organization or in their country, if they are an affiliate of a multinational, or if they become a CEO for the first time, one of the things that they takes a while to get used to is that they’re on show the whole time.

And the initial reaction is it’s unfair because I’m on a human being and then gradually they realize, well, that’s just part of the job. What you’re saying is just realizing day one, you’re being watched and they forward us do the right thing. And then I think it will be flying,

Richard: I guess, two fold there as an individual.

I’m I don’t like any skeletons, very uncomfortable skeletons. And I think I’m probably my own biggest critic. I use a lot of cliches, but I really am. I self-analyze myself to bits and all the rest of it. And I hope on the outside, people think I’m this laid back Ozzie, who doesn’t worry about anything. I plan what’s going on.

I think a lot about where we’re going, what’s happening. I retrospectively think about conversations I’ve had with people and I worry that I would ever upset anyone unfairly on an emotional level. You know, I’m, I’m prepared to go and swing some punches, but I would hate to think that I ever upset you when it goes to the level that stuff is, is, is, is, is worries me, but in terms of who I am and how I tick, I am very open and I don’t have too many.

I don’t like having anything to hide. I would never hide any new people. She’s pretty safe. And she, she, she tells me she’ll go and have an affair and I’ll have to let her off. She knows I’ll never have an affair because I’m just not built that way. So it underpins from a point of view that I’m watching myself pretty hard and I have very high.

Standards individually, but there was a moment, there was a moment of you talk about moments that make you think about things. There was a moment of work and we have in the office that I’m basting. We have some big stairs and it’s all very granting glass. I got overexcited when we build that anyway, I tend to run up the stairs and it’s just my thing.

Um, I, I like that. That’s who I am. And somebody said to me one day, because I’m a chatter, I’ll go and talk to whoever I’m one of, one of the young engineers or whoever it was said, do you know if you don’t run up the stairs, we think the business is in trouble. And I said, wax. I said, what? And they said, yeah, yeah.

They said, you know, we think it’s gone horribly wrong. And we start worrying and all the rest of it. And, and that was a penny dropping for me pod. And initially it was like, it was sort of funny. And then it was a bit like a grief cycle initially. It was funny. And then it was, Oh really? And then it was, but that’s okay because.

You know, I’m pretty straightforward. And, but what I try now and what I, what I’ve tried subsequently to do on that front is just make sure everyone knows me. And sometimes I’m just tired it’s because I went for a bike ride at a hundred miles a day before I’m just worn out. There’s nothing wrong with the company, but yeah, the openness is probably, yeah.

And people are watching and that’s good because you know, that’s our job. We get paid loads of money and we can Swan around and pretend we’re working. Well. The reason we get that privilege is because people depend on us when, when the times are tough. And part of that is be up, be up. Why wouldn’t you be, it’s not fair.

You work with a load of people and they come to work and that you get the privilege of them helping you do things. And we’re going to do is give them some money. It’s this thing’s bizarre to me. It’s a great deal. So why is it not fair that all you got to do is pretend

Pod: everything’s fine. It’s not that hard.

I’m sure it’s a little bit more than just that, but yes, your honor, the, the, the, the signals you send as a more senior leader are profound and, and people are watching for those and indeed making sense of those rightly or wrongly they’re they’re watching.

Richard: Yeah. And I think the caveat to all this is, and the long rambler, the start of that conversation about not having too many skeletons myself, I think it must be exhausting if you are not that person, it must be exhausting if really you’re winging it, or your life’s a mess on your own fire at home or stuff isn’t right.

Or whatever. And I guess my advice to that type of leader might be, well, maybe the whole open leadership. Thing’s not for you, you know, do you really need to run this organization or perhaps just doing the bit that you’re in at the moment, it’s got some sort of walls around it and you can keep home. In a good place and you can manage work at that level.

Maybe that’s a better place to aim. And maybe, maybe some of the ones that run, you know, just to have that desire to take over the world at the expense of their home lives and their families and all the rest of it. Yeah. I feel that’s an unhappy place to be. And I’m definitely not like that. I would give it all up tomorrow if, if it meant, you know, if it was jeopardizing my home life and who I was and who my family were, cause it’s

Pod: not, none of it study.

We hope you’re enjoying this episode of the leadership diet. Feel free to hit the subscribe button on whatever podcast player you are listening to this on reviews on iTunes and Spotify. I greatly appreciate it. I want to go back to when you, when you first joined Jackson partners and, and you, you, as you said, you put your hand up, you did lots of different things.

You tried different things. You were very successful, very fast and within, I think a short period of time, like within five years, you were approached to take on a major role in a different organization, quite a public organization with what you did. And then in many senses, that would have been a, you know, a dream come true.

You know, you you’d left Ozzie. He has been promoted very, very fast. You joined your head headhunted to join a large organization, and yet you said it was a big mistake. Uh, first of all, why was it a mistake? And what did it take for you to admit for yourself or realize for yourself, this is a mistake.

Richard: It was a mistake within, I would say, half an hour of getting to the organization.

It’s sort of really funny looking back. And it was one of the best things that ever happened to me, but, you know, that’s my nature to most things look positive somehow, but it really was. Yeah. So I hunted away someone got through the, through the barriers and. Got me on the phone and told me I was brilliant.

I met them a couple of times. I’d done reasonably well with, with Jackson at that stage. And it seemed natural maybe on the back of the sort of conversation I was just having, it seemed natural that I go and take over an even bigger business Jackson’s at that stage where a listed business. So they were a public business and a private business.

And I didn’t know the difference between the two. And I went to an even bigger one. And then the penny dropped when I had not been to their organization because it was one of these ones where they parachuted me in. But the guy who I took over from wasn’t aware during the interview process, that he wasn’t going to be there.

And I feel terrible about that. I will never be involved in one of them again, because that was wrong. But anyway, they told me he was rubbish and I was brilliant. And I went down there and I remember they had, I was in one of the directors suites of the organization and there was another one for even bigger directors and they have a punch code on the door.

Right. And I sat down and I went, this is uncomfortable. And I sat for about quarter of an hour and I spoke to, to my, whatever PA secretary at the time and which I feel again, I’m old school. You don’t have any of them anymore. I said, where’s the gang. Where, where are my people? And they said, really? They said, Oh, well you could go up and talk to some of them.

And I was later told that the boss had not been on that for, for something like 18 months. Wow. And I went, Oh, so yeah, it wasn’t, it wasn’t a leap of faith to realize, wow, I am in the wrong place, but I knew they’d find me within a year, which they did in those days. It was, you had a year before you had to pay loads of money.

And I took the year to meet so many big in the industry. I met a lot of people. I still hung onto the hope that they would love me eventually because secretly I wanted them to love me, but they didn’t. They hated me. They fired me in an old school, public hanging. They made me March out of the office with my box, the front page of our construction news over here and all that sort of thing.

And it was horrific, but it was brilliant. It was brilliant. It was exactly what I needed for an overconfident young guy. Who’d never got it wrong. Okay. Have your heart ripped out publicly and to come home and to have your wife go it’s okay. We’re fine. And that was a big moment because we literally, we shot too, but we changed our shopping habits.

We didn’t spend any money. And I launched the MBO attempt on my old business, along at that stage, which we managed to pull through in just under a year, we made that happen. And you know, I, all my Christmases come at once ever since really to, to be a private business and own that business when it’s got a bit of scale to it is in my opinion, as good as it gets.

So, yeah, but it was sort of horrible, but yeah, you can laugh now.

Pod: You weren’t laughing at the time, but if you have anything that you’ve said, I want to double down, he said, you realize pretty quickly is the wrong place for you. And that that’s one thing. You also realize there’s a high chance of that.

You’d be far within 12 months and at the same token, you, you were able to go, what can I do to optimize why I’m here, knowing that they made, they have to probably are going to fire me. That that’s an extraordinary way of thinking to be able to stop and pause and go. This is going to end badly. So I might as well make them also while I’m here, I guess, from the

Richard: outside.

But if you know me, I’m reasonably good. I hope I’m reasonably pragmatic about things. I guess there’s an underlying, and I say this to people all the time and it’s really hard, but we are where we are. We are where we are. I’m not very good at looking back. And that’s why this sort of conversation is sort of vaguely interesting.

Cause I never think about this stuff because it’s not who I am. I’m very interested in where we’re going and what’s happening and all the rest of it. So most of the time I end up at that point reasonably quickly and certainly more quickly now than it than even then. I was on the floor when they actually fired me.

But for the year before and the context I created and the friends I made and the things I learned about myself, working in a very difficult environment, working with difficult people, working with people who didn’t take the same way. I wouldn’t say it was easy, but it was, it was healthy. And it’s been a bit of a bedrock moving forward.

But, yeah, it’s just the way I take really. I it’s, it’s all you can do. You are where we are. I couldn’t afford to walk a day in those days. I didn’t, I didn’t have any money, any real money. So I had to see it out and it still hurt really badly. Cause I don’t like failing and I don’t like, like a lot of people who’ve been done.

Okay. In business, you know, secretly the fear of failure is there for all of us. So it didn’t like that. But yeah, I think, I think we managed to turn that into a positive, but you know, people, people was really important to that. And one or two mates who jumped on the phone straight away and said, now come on.

If we come in and play golf and say, I’m not playing go. They hate me. The world hates me. And they, when you come to Blake golf, I’m coming around to your house. And yet

Pod: you’re back on the horse. So strong family support friendship from, from other folks what us grounded you are sustained. You joined that transition when you were exiting there and before you actually had gone into the MBO.

Healthy,

Richard: as I said, the only problem is somebody

Pod: who’s

Richard: very quick to criticize themselves when it goes wrong, you can get lost in that criticism. You can be lost in the, if only if only you’re finding the truth was it was fundamentally wrong. And I knew that within, within the assistant to you half an hour of being in place, it took a little while to believe in myself and go, you know what?

That was never going to work. Once I got to that point, I was lucky that the MBA became an opportunity. I’d had a chat with the guys who own Jackson’s before I left. And I said, if you ever want to do a buyout, if you would ever be interested in a buyer. And there was a gentleman by the name of David Jackson, who was a tough guy, but he said, look, I’ll give you a chance if there, if we ever get to that point and the fact that I could knock on his door and I’m pretty good at not burning bridges, I gave David a call and I said, look, any chance.

And he said, yeah, you can give it a go. You’ve got to be in the, you’ve got to beat against the rest of the world and all that sort of stuff. But it was a reasonably big MBO for us. And I just got immersed in that. And that, that brought me back. I was back in my place and we were pitching to people and trying to get money out of people.

And, you know, there was a for, for awhile, there, there was a lot of faking it to make it as well. Again, you know, there was sort of, there’s a bit of jazz hands when we’re trying to get money out of people. Whereas on the inside, I was still really hurt. But you soon get back to where it was. And then the MBO was one of the best things when we actually did it.

And we completed, that was just a fabulous moment and

Pod: changed my life forever. Let’s jump straight there. MBA was fraught with danger. The often does, they often don’t work. In fact, they don’t work more often than that than they do. When you think back to the early days, it was all signed and sealed. And now suddenly you’re in charge of this business and you’re now, or one of the owners of this business, which is, you know, your first time in that, what, what, what are some of your memories of those moments in terms of, Hey, now I’m in charge and by the way, we owed desk to some banks who will hold us accountable to it.

Richard: If I’m honest, I didn’t worry too much about it. I’ve always been worried about cash, but any decent manager understands that the money that you’ve got to understand the money. So I already did that. I understood what made the thing tick the pressure I felt, okay, how do we do that? The smiley face part of me loved the fact that we had.

Read ourselves of the corporate I’m gonna lead this way a bit. The corporate rubbish that goes with a lot of the organizations. You know, I think you’ve probably realized by now, we’re not very good at all that we don’t do the politics thing. We’re very, very open. And, and we don’t like anyone who goes down the corporate route and if they come to us and they were overly corporate, we either beat them into shape or they go because that’s just not us.

So fabulous. Fabulous to be away from all that a little bit scary, but. I’d already run the business for a fair while previous anyway, before I left. So I knew how to run the business. We had some guys who back the MBO was the other half of our group now, which has called sch group. Um, and they’d back. They put a lot of money into it.

So I had a fallback. I had another mentor on that side who subsequently we bought out in. I bought out in 2014. So it was a combination of two groups. So we had some stability on that side. We bolted in our NBO bit. The only real pressure I felt and have ever really felt is for

Pod: the people we have. You mentioned, we’ve got.

Richard: We’ve got five or 600 people. If you do the multiplier on that, I can lose sleep at night. I think your family is, I think of the people that rely on us as a business. That’s the only pressure I’ve ever really felt called that if I really screw this up, there’s a lot of people relying on us. Now, the truth is they probably go off and get another job somewhere, but that’s, I can’t look at it that way because I think we provide a pretty reasonable place to work and we have some fun and we try really hard and I want them to have a wonderful life and I want their kids to come and work for us and have a wonderful life.

And yeah, that’s, that’s a big motivator for me. So yeah. When, when you suddenly got the MBA on your own, that rings in your ears a little bit more particularly when you, you miss some stuff up. We did a bit of that.

Pod: As the chief exec, you are not the only person, but you play a big role in setting the culture and setting the future direction for the organization.

It came out of a different business and, and you realize culturally that was dramatic, the wrong place for you. So what were the lessons you, you, you took and, and how did you go about setting? What is now the, you know, the, the organizational culture in, in either overtly or just the way you behaved and then, and, you know, leave the organization.

Richard: Good question. And along the way, some things I’ve got some things wrong and that shaped who I am, but I don’t do a lot of sort of self management coaching or any of that sort of stuff. I think I was a very poor engineer, so I couldn’t build a thing. I couldn’t design anything, but I’m not too bad with people.

I quite like the detail of understanding how things work. I’m quite curious. And if you combine all that and you get a lot of luck along the way, it sort of works. But I guess the culture of the business, because I’ve been in charge for so long, Particularly the bits that I’m very close with, probably reflect my sort of open approach to management, friendly stuff.

We have lots of fun. I mean, our vision statement, if you like, I’ll call it that, but we don’t call it. That is happy people making money, happy people because life’s too short to be grumpy and making money because we have to pay the bills and that reflects on the whole business and people get that. They remember it.

It’s simple. And it’s just true. It’s just true. So in terms of cultures and whatnot, I think it probably reflects who I am and I’d love to pretend it was more sophisticated than that, but along the way you learn and you see the way others do it. And we definitely didn’t want to do any of that stuff. We just want to keep it simple.

Pod: That sounds like it works

Richard: well. Yeah, the stomach, if you measure it, however you measure it, we’re all pretty happy and that’s a good

Pod: stop and the money will take care of itself. Absolutely. You mentioned some mentors in Graeme, you meant there’s another person called David Branwell who was a mentor for you earlier in terms of how to work with boards.

I’m interested in that notion because in your, in your role, as, as group chief exec, you’ve, you’ve got a range of different companies under the one construction banner, and they’re all led by different MDs. What’s it like being the personal and the business relative to now running and leading other MDs or running a series of businesses.

How did you transition from, from one, from one level to the more senior level. I think the most

Richard: important bit in that aspect is not being the boss. I think when you get these hierarchical business and you’ve got a group chief, chief exec, and then you’ve got MDs or, or chief execs or CEOs of different departments or different parts of the world and all the rest of it, that the ego thing can get in the way, because you’ve got the big boss in that local region.

And then you’re a bigger boss. And then you’ve got this weird dynamic of, I can’t work with him or her or whatever. And whereas they know a bit, like I was saying before, they now I’m the boss. I don’t think of myself as the boss, but I’m naturally the one. Yeah. Probably probably take some slightly more helicopter view of things because that’s the way my brain ticks and what that allows us to what happened is the local MBA MD can still be the MD cause that’s really important, particularly in front of their boards.

So I get lots of board meetings and we chat and I try not to talk as much as I’ve told you today, it’s hard for me. And I try and let the M D chaired the meeting properly. Now I do let the MD chair, the meeting properly and run it. And I’m a visitor. Who happens to be an owner of the business and what not, but I’m definitely a visitor in their world.

One-on-one slightly different because I’ll sit down with some of those MDs and knock some heads together if we have to. And, and I’ll ask for that same feedback. Straight back. I’ll say, if I’m wrong, we’ll have that discussion. But my job is to make sure that we’d be successful and that we manage this well.

And on this particular one, this is what I want to do. So I think you’ve got to put slightly different hats on, but I quite like it. I love the fact that I can go from quite diverse businesses. We’ve got, you know, obviously lots of construction businesses. We’ve got a logistics business, we’ve got a retail business, we’ve got quite a blank on divert.

We develop, we build houses, we will grow to build all sorts of things. And I love the fact that I can bring snippets from those different businesses and share them in, in each board and just sort of get it out there and say, well, these guys, cause each businesses have a slightly different stage in terms of its evolution or its uh, the dynamics of the team or the X six session.

You’ve got some with younger teams, quite keen on young people in senior positions. I love that. So you’ve got a real blend of sectors and teams of challenges. And I think that works well for both me to be able to share some of those things. You know, very open and try and try and translate and make it simple.

I think if you’re not careful, if you’ve got a young board and they’ve got somebody coming in or a very complex explanation of what they should be doing it just, whereas we can sort of dumb it down or rip it up and they can also share resources with we’ve done most things somewhere. So we can say, Hey, we’ve done this.

Don’t worry. I’ll give you a starting point. And that, and that nurturing part of me that that’s, I love that part of my job and seeing those businesses then turn and do really well in the individuals in those businesses do really well. Yeah. Incredibly satisfying. So yeah, I had to change. I had to become less the boss, but I, I, I don’t really want to be the boss anyway.

So it wasn’t that hard.

Pod: A few things that you said, I like to have a young people in senior positions. Now I can. I think I know why, but tell me your reasoning as to why that’s something that’s attractive to you. Young, because

Richard: they’re still pulling up trees. A lot of people who are just ribbon things out of the ground and let’s go try some stuff, let’s do some stuff and then I can be the old guy going, Hey, well, let’s just make sure we manage that risk and commercially, it makes sense.

And we’re dealing with the right sort of people before you go ripping out trees. Young because they are still making mistakes. The last thing I want to do is work with people. Who’ve never done it wrong. So I liked the fact of working with ones that while they’re getting it wrong, I can keep an eye on them, pick them up when they’re down and the learning that comes with that.

So you end up with a very strong team of experienced people at a younger age, young, because they’re more fun. So guys really, you know, they’ve got more to gain. I’ve gained everything. I just want to be surrounded by people who are just a bit over-excited and get it wrong. I say that it’s a blend. We’ve got a blend like everywhere, but I’m, I guess I’m not afraid to promote early and nor should Julius B.

Why not? Why not? You, you were probably given a chance and if you not careful, you get older and you start getting your team going. They’re not ready. They’re ready.

Pod: Well, where’s twist talks to your own background. And in terms of, you know, you, you came to England and within four years, or you were running a list of business.

So, you know, people gave you goals and then you jumped into it. And I, you said you made mistakes along the way, but you learn phenomenally fast.

Richard: Yeah. Yeah. And how can it not be fair for you to give people the same opportunities that you’re given? The only caveat to that is a young me thought that everyone wanted to run every business and that everyone, anyone that sort of was striving to take over the world and I sort of felt that’s what you’re supposed to be doing.

And I remember I took a year off before I went to university before I decided what I was going to do and pretend that I wanted to be an engineer. I was working in a, in a Hi-Fi shop at Lithgo. So Western Sydney, middle of nowhere. And I remember chatting one day to a guy who used to come by once a week and sweep the footpath and I’ll talk to anyone.

And I was chatting to this guy. I said, Hey, tell me, tell me about your job. What’s what’s it all about? He says, I, well, I, I sweep here and I’ll do this. And I said, well, what’s the favorite thing about your job? And he said, on a Friday, the pie shop, they, if they have any leftover pies, they’ll give me a couple of pies.

He says, I can take it home. And we can have pies for dinner on a Friday night. And I said, I said, you’ve got a great job only you should have. I’ve got the best job in the world. And I was like, ah, I get it. I get it. And that’s the only code. The point of that story is if suddenly I understood everyone wants to get to different places and there’s always somebody more successful and made more money and drives a faster car.

And, and there’s more better looking and got a more beautiful family. And you know what? None of that matters, it’s about finding your place in life and finding a place where you’re content. This individual was very content. And the point of all that random Jap is don’t just assume that promoting people up because they look like they want to get there as the right answer.

You’ve got to know them well enough and you’ve got to go, are they ready for this? Or are they a sworn on the outside pretending to do the corporate thing, but underneath they’re struggling. So be careful about, and give them a way out, give them a backward step. Don’t do the all or nothing. So say, Hey, well, why don’t we try you in this area?

And if you don’t like it, you can go back to your old job or work hard on that. Easing the mill. And I think if you do that nine times out of 10, the good ones will get there. But if you throw them in the deep end and that’s what the big corporates tend to do to like, they throw them in. And then within six months, I go, well, they’re not brilliant.

As far as I’m concerned, that’s your fault. You’re not nurturing them and not putting

Pod: them into the room. Yeah, exactly. Right. Probably the wisest CEO I ever worked with setting, if an executive fairs within the first year of the business, that’s my fault. It was the second year of the business, then that’s their fault, you know?

So yeah. I love what you said there about everyone. Once just to find what they love to do. And it doesn’t mean that it’s promoted the whole notion of, you know, do what you love, I think is actually overrated. And it’s more about love what you do, because the more, if you just love what you do, you’re going to have fun anyway, whereas you may never find what you love, but whatever you’re doing, just love it.

Completely agree,

Richard: completely agree. And that, then that reflects in the way you, your podcasts, your tone, the way you talk about business. And I think that’s one of the reasons why I love listening to your stuff, because there’s a, there’s an underlying tone of, well, why wouldn’t we talk about this? Cause it’s fantastic.

It’s really interesting things. And I hope I’m the same in, in what I do. Yeah. I’m a bit overenthusiastic and sometimes you get to listen to a lot of words to, to get the content are still struggling, but I hadn’t been better educated by ticketing. I probably could have said what we’ve said in the last hour, in the last five minutes, but why wouldn’t you be excited about the opportunity?

And for me, it was just the bit that I happened to be okay. Ed was a management type of thing. But if that had, if I hadn’t been. A bit more pride where I had a liked. You know, a different sort of job in a different part of the organization or whatnot, I’d be just as happy, but I’m just, wasn’t very good at that.

I couldn’t

Pod: pretend to do it. So you, you, you, you found both what you love to do and you love doing it, which is that the magic place really, you mentioned a few minutes ago, the support of, of your family and how important family is for you. And I know you to be someone who really values fitness and health, and that’s a core part of, of helping you be you can you, can you just give us a bit of insight into the routines you have in order to keep yourself quite healthy?

And then this was a second question is given the schedule that you have, and you’ve had for quite a while you had all these, you know, 20 offices, et cetera, how do you maintain that schedule and work would try so hard to take over your new routines.

Richard: Yeah, definitely routine, but by nature and my car keys live on the hook.

And if they’re not there, I can’t item because that’s the only place they can live on that sort of guy, much to everyone else’s discussed. I’m sure people lose as a keys on purpose just to why me out pretty good at routine and pretty good at not missing things. So, you know, I, every day I have to do something physical, I have to go for a bike ride or go for a walk, go to the gym, and I’ve got a bit of a schedule of how I do that.

Probably deep down. Don’t want to get old. I want to live forever. I’m a bit like that. I’ve always. So as I watch my body crumble, I don’t like that. So I’m fighting it, but I’m just enthusiastic about stuff. I’m a, I’m a keen, I love skiing. So I’ve got to be fair when you go skiing, because it’s just fabulous and you’re there, but you’ve got to be really fit so you can feel day.

And then I do it as much as anything because I just feel so much better being in a fit place and being healthy and not carrying too much weight and all that sort of thing. That’s not to say it’s right or wrong. It’s just how I’m built. I force myself to jam sessions in. So if I’ve got board meetings in the morning or afternoon, I’ll make sure that I top and tail it and go and do that thing because I feel if I’m physically, I’ve done some things and I’ve got out and I’ve got some air it’s better for the business.

Anyway, I perform better and you’re more alive. And that flows off on everyone else. If you’re the sort of boss that sits in the corner office and doesn’t do a lot, I think that. Sends a statement out to the rest of the organization. It’s become a lot easier. I mean, now I don’t do nearly as much as I did.

I now have boards that run every company. I stepped down from MD of the biggest company two years ago now. And let one of the younger guys who we was talking about South Africans, well, how did I let that happen? Brian stoner, terrific job, lovely guy making loads of mistakes and upsetting everyone. But he, I

Pod: should pause you and say that you and I are looking at each other to the screen and I can see you’re laughing as you say that.

Whereas the listeners will think it’s been deliberately derogatory South Africans. It’s not true.

Richard: Oh, it’s definitely a love, love relationship with the southerners. Once you, if you’re in the Northern hemisphere where I love all the Sabines, now Brian’s a tricky guy and we’ve got quite a few South African son.

I love him to bits, pretty punchy at times I’ve got to sort of pull them back a little and go, did you really mean that? But, uh, with Brian taking over the largest individual business, In some ways, I feel a bit of an imposter now. Cause I’ve, I’ve got relatively, I’ve got lots of time, lots and lots of time.

And I did that for a number of reasons, partly because I was getting older mainly because I didn’t want to be that old guy who never left didn’t want to be the guy in the way or girl who just suddenly their views are outdated and they’re hanging on and they still want to be the boss. And because I don’t need to be the boss, it was easy for me to go, you know what?

You guys take it over, run with it, go and have some fun. And yeah, that worked out pretty well. But you know, I was very, very worried about waiting in that sort of really operational role too long, because I think it just stops the business

Pod: ultimately. And where’s the future for you and the business? Um,

Richard: horrible question mainly because that’s, that’s my Achilles heel.

I want to keep doing it forever. I want to live forever. I want to keep running the business forever. I don’t want to get in the way I’m gradually hoovering up the odd little business on the, on the outskirts. So I was with a business yesterday that I’d love to be involved with. I can’t quite convince him to let me in there yet what’s happening with the pandemic.

And one that I think in the UK they’ll certainly be opportunities or are there are beginning to be opportunities for smaller businesses, with good teams that are just in a bad place. We can offer a pretty good home for those types of businesses. And I mentioned the logistics business. We picked them up 18 months ago.

I love it. And that keeps me alive because it’s a new sector. It’s something I’m, I’m not particularly interested in, but I’m interested because I don’t know anything about it. And we’re moving stuff all over the world and that’s fantastic and exciting. And I hope to Hoover up a few of them over the next, you know, five, 10 years and things that I’m personally really interested in, but the same model, get ownership, some ownership there, I, I own group, but group owns most of the subsidiaries and someones some local ownership and then really nurture some of those teams to go and just do some interesting stuff and grow and, and, and have fun.

So, but don’t ask me about exit because I don’t want to know it’s a long time ago. The money didn’t matter. I’m very lucky. So now the idea of having to exit is horrible and ruining my kids and all that sort of stuff is a bit of a worry. So I don’t know the answer to that real because it wasn’t supposed to go this well, it should have crushed it.

Now there’s still time.

Pod: Well, if you have all the right young guys running the business, that the likelihood of crashing is, is not very high, which I suspect is part of your grand plan, but coming to the end of this great conversation, Richard, I really appreciate you giving me this time for this conversation.

It’s been delightful and insightful. Every episode I finished with the same two questions. So I’m going to finish with the same two for you. What is your favorite song or your favorite band?

Richard: Okay, favorite band or song. Now I want to answer that one. I love music. I always listen to music, anything from very early sort of rock and roll and R and B and all the way through to current stuff.

And if I chose one, it would mean that I’m not choosing somebody else. I’ll tell you what, I’ll go with a local just to make it easy. We, we’re not funded very close to ed Sheeran. And I lived in Framingham, which is castle on the Hill. And so that’s a little warm spot and it’s a head and the family there.

They’re really nice people. So let’s go with

Pod: it. Fair enough. And the word wisdom has come through in our college a few times tonight. If you could turn back the time and talk to your 30 year old version of you, what would you tell them?

Richard: Two problems with that? I wouldn’t be able to tell me anything, because if some old guy tried to tell me stuff, I wouldn’t listen at all, I’d be interested in is what’s happened.

What sort of, what sort of technology have they got? And I wouldn’t show up for long enough to listen. So that’s the first problem. And secondly, I wouldn’t tell myself a thing because. I’m in a very good place with who I am. And I’m, I’m a direct consequence of the mistakes I’ve made and the twists in the road.

But the journey for me is so important that I wouldn’t want the young man to not make him take his own journey. And all the goods in the beds that have happened have put me in a pretty good place in terms of my family and who I am. And so why would I tell myself anything? I’d just talk about the future.

Tell me about the latest, whatever

Pod: I’ve been asking that question of, of leaders for all. I’m guessing 20 years now, and answers tend to drop into various themes depending on who you speak to. But the people who, who are very comfortable with who they are irrespective of where they are in life, but who they are as human beings always have the same answer, which is what you just said, which is I wouldn’t tell them anything.

I just go live your life and, and, and enjoy your life. And your life will be your life as opposed to here’s my view of your life. So it sounds like you’re in a happy place. All things

Richard: with what I was given as a starting point, I never thought it would quite be this good so far, but you know, plenty of time to mess it up yet.

Pod: Well, on that note, Richard, if you do mess it up, let’s book you in for a second podcast. So we can hear about the other side of the story, but the front of the first version has been a delight tonight. I’m so glad that my wife and your friend Carol had put us together, have this conversation. You guys are not there for a long time.

I think after today’s conversation in case he didn’t realize I have so much fun in that MTV with Richard, it is always good to interview a founder because as a class of leader, they are relatively unique in the sense of having taken complete risk and backing themselves and setting up a new organization.

But a founder who has been successful and it also is having not a fun along the way is even more unique. I’m so great to have the time with Richard. I’m not sure about you, but I took lots of learnings from that conversation. But for the purpose of this summary here at the end, I’m going to pick out five that really resonated for me in our conversation.

The first one is the very simple, but profound statement. Be confident enough to take advice from anyone from learning perspective. What struck me about this is leaders who are confident to ask. Other people for advice are demonstrating a few different things. The demonstrating their ability and desire to learn that demonstrating their, their realization that whilst they might have lots of good ideas and indeed their ideas might be.

Very good. In some cases, the best ones, they’re not the audio ideas. And they’re willing to add interested in finding out other ideas from other people in doing so they’re also demonstrating a willingness to source opinions that then lead to buy-in. The most successful change agents in the world are those who engage in good dialogue, not who force opinions through strong influence.

So being confident enough to take advice from anyone goes to increasing levels of humility and a desire to learn or bring other people along in the conversation.

The second idea for me that really jumped out at me and, uh, you know, this cause we spoke a fair bit about it in the interview. And indeed the grab upfront talks to this and that is the experience Richard had in his career where he was very publicly fired and indeed humiliated, uh, in an organization that he took on the CEO role for and left within a year after he was fired, excite exactly a year later.

And what I loved about the whole story was. He knew that they would fire him. He knew that there was a process that they had to go through and they would wait for a year. And indeed the experience was horrific as he said, but quite brilliant. And what really jumped out to me is that simple phrase, we are way we are, and it’s a simple phrase, but it goes to whenever we find ourselves in trouble or in adverse times, we can spend a lot of time ruminating on why we got here or indeed the injustice of the event.

And when our personal resilience is hit, our own narrative gets a very big headline. I E we are being done to, and it’s a very. Natural human phenomenon to wallow in a degree of pity or at least the injustice or whatever is happening, even if that is completely true, but it doesn’t actually help. And his notion of we are aware, we are allows you to steady the boat and re center yourself to figure it out.

Here’s where we are. What can we do right now that will help us move forward. And his case, he spent almost a year building up relationships across the industry. We stand helped him when he went forward and charted the MBO, as we heard in the rest of the story, took that on to great success. So the notion of how do we find ourselves in a difficult situation and what can we do to center ourselves and the phrase he uses, we are where we are, therefore let’s move forward.

It’s a great way of changing the narrative, changing this story, understanding that our resilience might be currently hit, but. We don’t need to wallow on that. We can still chart away.

Starting for me was his realization that culture in his organization is a reflection of him. Now, this is not a new idea told, um, but a lot of leaders forget this. A lot of leaders forget that the more senior they are, they cast a larger shadow. And this not just goes to people wondering what the leader is actually thinking about, but actually the leader is on show.

The leader is on pedestal leaders on stage. And what they are doing is sending signals around the organization as to he is how he gets stuff done around here. Because X leader on Y leader does it that way. He hears the culture and the more you understand who you are and how you be. As a leader actually.

Co-create if not actively creates the culture around you. So taking stock of the culture around you means you’re taking stock of yourself, which can be quite confronting. It can be intimidating to understand that there are 10, 20 hundreds, maybe thousands of people around the organization taking signals from what you do and say, and following that, it doesn’t mean that they are lemons.

It doesn’t mean they’re idiots. It just means that’s how culture works. So as a leader, how do you take time to take stock of the culture in your team, in your function, in your organization and realize that it is in some ways a reflection of who you are, and then therefore, if the culture is working well, great amplify, who you are even more.

So if the culture is not helping the organization, how do you start changing that by yourself? How do you start changing the way you. Interact with other leaders, other teams, other functions are across the organization. And how has that, that ripple effect from you amplify the culture around the whole organization.

The fourth thing, which I love it is also a classic business founder thinking and business founder mentality. And that is how do I find young hungry leaders who are still malleable in their thinking, but are willing to, to have a go to rip our trees to have fun. How do I promote them early in order to give them a go?

Because of course they are ready. The larger the organization, the more bureaucratic the process that seems to emerge with the best of intentions in the sense of there’s a talent development, talent spotting, a talent acquisition process in place. And by nature that becomes more organized, more structured, and sometimes more bureaucratic.

I understand that completely, but his mentality of looking for talent and coupled with that, looking for their motivators, because just because someone is talented doesn’t mean they necessarily want to be promoted, but finding those people who are ready, who are, want to take risks, who want to make mistakes, who are willing to learn, who are willing to put energy into the place who are willing to have it go, who are willing to be mobile, set them up early, put them into a bigger role.

Yes. Support them. So they don’t drown. Don’t wait five years before you give them that, go get them ready now, because in his case, and indeed what I’ve seen many times across my career, these leaders often surprises the earlier they are given responsibility, lots of them will take it on a normal fit in places that we would never have expected.

Yes, of course there are mistakes. Yes, of course. Sometimes they flame out. Yes, of course. Sometimes they are well promoted and that is always true, but the converse is also true. Sometimes they do fantastically well using his phrase, ripping our trees, still making mistakes, but having fun and willing to have a go look for those leaders, give them projects, give them responsibility and see what they.

last learning, which I did make a comment on when he said this, but I love, love, love what he said at the very end, in terms of at the end of the day, if he had an opportunity to speak to his 35 year old version of himself, he wouldn’t say anything because today Richard recognizes that he is a direct consequence of his own mistakes.

And as a leader who has made many, many mistakes in my own life, I am still learning. How do I own those mistakes? And how do I fully accept that and learn from that and be okay with that. And what I’m realizing is the more I appreciate, I am a direct consequence of those mistakes. The more I’m enjoying that those mistakes happened.

Thank you for listening to another episode of the leadership diet. We hope you enjoyed it. Head over to www.thedishofdiet.com, where you can subscribe to the podcast to our blogs and retrieve the show notes. From each episode. Every show note has links to whatever resources were mentioned by our guests, including their favorite song or band.

And the best way you can support this podcast is by subscribing and sharing it with your colleagues and friends. So they can hear the insights from our guests as well. Thank you.

Or download as a PDF:

Ep 19. Disrupting the education sector by listening, being curious and innovating

Helen Souness is the CEO of RMIT online, the digital education arm of one of the quiet achieving and hyper-successful universities in Australia. She shares with us some great insights including;
 
  • Looking for tail lights in other sectors gives clues for innovation
  • Disruptors often start off as curators of other peoples ideas
  • Listening and being curious allows you to learn fast
  • How she moved from the legal industry through digital markets
  • Her firm belief in the benefits of being curious
  • How she has consistently built up successful teams

and much more…

Show notes

Transcript

Pod: Pod here today. I’m joined by Helen Souness, who is the chief executive officer for our RMIT online , RMIT being one of Australia’s oldest and most successful universities. She is an experienced leader in the global digital marketplace sector. Having worked for such great brands as seek.com and Envato, Etsy and now, or RMIT.  We discussed what it’s like to become a CEO for the first time and how her experience has helped her to scale leadership teams in different organizations around different countries.

We talk about why psychological safety is important, not so much to build up trust in teams, although it I’ve seen it does that, but to allow you as a leader to receive feedback and to allow you as a leader, to understand the impact that you are having on your team and then day four, how do you lead that into a constructive conversation for everybody?

We discuss how someone who is so big into relationship building, how they are managing COVID and the various different ways she’s using technology to scale relationship in a time where people are really missing the social contact of being together in the same office. And we also discuss what I call male pale and stale leadership, i.e., all command and control style, or why that has given way to skills such as listening, learning, being fully transparent, which often are skills that are often in abundance  within female leaders, and how this opens it door to servant leadership and indeed in her case, extraordinary innovation.

 

In our introduction, people will have heard me introduce you, but let’s talk about  RMIT, the university, you know, it’s one of the quite achievers in the Australian educational landscape, you know, set up in 1887 as a working man’s college, became a university in 1992 through a whole series of mergers and acquisitions.

And now has campuses in Victoria. Barcelona and various relationships across Asia Honda thousand students, 11,000 staff, 41% international students. Wow. That’s a success story on itself. And then you joined three years ago to head up the online education part of our MIT. Tell us about that part of the organization and what you’re doing there.

Helen: Yeah, look, it was an amazing opportunity because our MIT does have the DNA that I believed we needed to really attack in Ernest the need for updating of skills for lifelong learners, as we, as we call out how students. So the adult of the working adults who. No longer, you know, you get a degree and you’re set for life on your education.

Things are changing too fast. Technology is changing too fast, so we need to upgrade our skills constantly throughout our careers. And I really felt there was a lot to be done in that space, especially when I actually, as part of the interview process started taking online courses and thought naughty.

They have not brought the best of digital skills to education yet when you look at the user experience. So.I became very excited about it. And I thought then, and that certainly proves the case that our, my team was a university to do it with because it had that, I mean, it was formed by the working association to meet the needs of the city.

  And it’s been in the DNA ever since. I mean, it’s, it’s Royal Melbourne Institute of technology given the oil because of its research on a bomb technology in the second world war with industry. Yeah. That’s, that’s, it’s very deep in the DNA. So we were tapping into something that was there and very strong in the brand already, but then we’ve really brought industry and to the online education experience really brought the best of digital skills.

To building that experience with the wonderful educators of our MIT. And yeah, it’s been a very fun mission for the last few years.

Pod: Now you said a few things I want to double down on the straightaway is you use the word user experience and given your background, which bill covered, I’m sure over the next half an hour or so user experience has been a large part of the years you focused on.

Can you tell me a bit more about education sector and then the digital user experience and how you’ve been able to navigate that and maybe even transform that over the last number of years.

Helen: Yeah, it’s a, it’s a fascinating one because you know, she and I, as a digital person for 15, 20 years in digital experiences, is that users all that you test everything you do and you, you AB test, ideally you see, you know, we do controls and you understand exactly how you improve your experience incrementally and then big leaps of testing.

That’s a very different. Attitude for an educator whose view as the student must do the work to learn. And it’s proven in the research that a student must engage in and do certain things to get a learning outcome that the teacher is not responsible for that two worlds collide in a very interesting way around.

You know, user testing and so on, but I think we are finding a really, a great course to navigate there. Yes, absolutely. A student needs to make the effort to actually acquire knowledge and skill new skills, but. We can make everything around that experience and that effort as easy as possible. So this is what we really try to bring to, to education.

It’s not all on the student. We make it as frictionless as possible for them to acquire those skills and have all the support. So very human support. It’s not a mood. It’s not a go learn on your own. We have success coaches and teaches all the way along in all of our short courses and. Postgraduate programs and, and yeah, bringing the best of those two skill sets together has been one of the biggest challenges of my career, but also one of the most satisfying, because they’re both needed, you know, you need to make it as easy as possible as supported as possible, but yes, the student also, you know, we need to assess that student and make sure they’ve made the effort to acquire that new skill.

So it’s a fascinating mix

Pod:I remember when I first started doing online courses and you mentioned the word move to note, the notion of the summer stuff put online and a lot of it for free originally. And it was so exciting, but I started my own experience was you get excited in the first two or three sessions, and then the tension level just drops off and drops off.

And I’ve no idea how many courses I’ve started and not finished yet. What why you’re talking about is as a human behavior teacher relationship experience, that is equally important to the digital experience to make these learning viable. Is that right?

Helen: Yeah, absolutely. And we had a hypothesis at the beginning that even in our short, you know, very industry skill focused courses, we needed a start date and an end date, and we needed people to support that learner and engaged in social learning aspects between student and teacher and between students themselves.

And yes, MOOCs get single digit completion rates where. Getting well, the majority of our students in every course through and, you know, so it had in best practice now. So, you know, the hypothesis is proven, correct that actually you need some support. You need to belong to a cohort to, to really feel committed to this learning experience.

Cause there’s moments where it gets hard, especially for working adults who often have kids full time jobs, deadlines, and work. It’s a really challenging process for them, but. Know, we’re getting a lot of them through most of them. Sorry. I

Pod: love what you said there you’ve, you’ve, you’ve stated close to the DNA of the original university, which was to serve the needs of the city or the people in the city, either working people.

And what you just said there is, is, you know, when you’re really busy mom or dad who doing some education in their own time, they’ve got to feel part of something. Otherwise the temptation just to drift is just far too big and, and the competing commitments are far too huge.

Helen: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we have the, you know, the perennial learners that just, that is their, that is their hobby people that get through.

But most of us, we need, you know, good planning. Some of our success coaching is all about how are you going to find the time let’s look at your week? Where are the slots? How do we commit all of this as part of helping learners succeed?

Pod: So the education sector in Australia is, is I think is in our second or third largest export.

Marketing for the country. So our reading port and sector, how has the online division of our MIT gone over the last three years since you came in and took it over?

Helen: I’ll look, it it’s been an amazing ride in my team. We’ve tripled our revenue and more than tripled our enrollments. We’ve created some new portfolios.

So the short courses was really in an Australian first to build short courses with industry. A lot of private sector was really active. Of course, Sierra and university were the ones. Taking that market, you know, Versity’s were a little slower into that space and that’s where we’ve, I guess, innovated over the last few years, it’s been an amazing ride, came in with a, what was it?

A ragtag team of 20. Gotcha.

Pod: Okay. That’s a big growth.

Helen: I really, from the best digital companies, as well as the best universities, so real, you know, trying to in everything we do bring together the best of education, the best of digital.

Pod: Sounds like you make an education sexy again.

Helen: That would be great.

Pod: I have no doubt about that.

Let’s jump to your role as CEO because when you and I were chatting before this call, a few days ago, one of my realizations was, this is your first time. As the complete CEO, you’ve had a lot of leadership roles, which we go through in a minute. But as your first time in the CEO role, what’s the, what was the transition like for you stepping into this and knowing that you were in charge of growth and you’re in charge of growth full stop.

This is the buck stops with you. Yes.

Helen: Yeah, look, I I’ve loved it. And I’ve been incredibly lucky to have amazing support from my board, which I think is incredibly important to have great teamwork between CEO and board to make it work. In fact, You know, my chair is the vice chancellor of the university. He comes from tic in the U S a lot of his career, as well as education roles.

So he understands taking risks and it’s been just an incredible partnership with him as my, I guess, boss and with the whole board. Definitely the buck stops with me and we have taken a lot of risks. I mean, you don’t have accelerated growth without taking risks, taking bits that you don’t know pay. But I think the fact that my board has always come on that journey being prepared to go.

Yep. Great. We learned something from that, the less successful prizes and. You know, really celebrate our wins with us has made that just an easy transition actually. I mean, it’s sure there’s a pressure to owning the numbers, but there’s also an incredible buzz too. I mean, the numbers and making a lot of the calls and being empowered to do so.

That’s what I’ve absolutely loved about it. So yeah. Lucky, lucky, easy transition in many ways.

Pod: Bye. Well done you and the board for, for taking the risk, but I’m, I’m really intrigued by a sector that. You know, in many sense that would be considered to be a conservative sector and sense of education’s been around for a long time.

And here you are going to the board taking risks. Can you walk us through, what is the conversation or the thinking passion or the preparation for you as a CEO, going into the board with here’s what we want to do. Here’s a risk that we’re taking. Here’s what we don’t know. Can you back us up? What’s that like for you?

Helen: I guess in so many decisions that there is absolute unknowns on a university, doing some of the things we’ve done for sure. And even in the university products, the accredited postgraduate products, we’ve created products as I call them so many educators, don’t like that word, postgraduate programs that are the Fest in the world.

So we’ve taken risks even there, you know, a post-graduate. Caucasian in product management and other future of work type roles that have never been done before, will they work? And there’s all those data and not just data. Look at tail light in other sectors to look at, as we call them in the private sector.

In the short courses space. Yes, we were taking a risk for us university to credential, but. The private sector was getting, you know, $80 million of funding per company to do this sort of course, and getting amazing traction and usage. So I think much of what you’re doing has never been done. There is taillights.

There’s the skills shortage data in the market. There was a burning need so long as you then do good work to produce a good quality product that is going to be fit for purpose and get the students through to the learning outcome. They would calculate the dress, I guess, is what I’m saying. There was always some data, as well as the unknowns.

I

Pod: read a quote from bill Gates in an interview or a post when I was actually blog, he wrote a few weeks ago, he said the two most important questions in his career that he regularly asked himself who else has done this or solve this problem before elsewhere. And how do I learn from them? So I’m guessing what you’re saying is the taillights is, is that you say you’d like it as is the evidence left behind from someone else solving a silver similar problem.

That’s where.

Helen: Yeah, absolutely. I think some of my best career advice was steal with pride, with ideas. I think lots of, lots of innovators are actually curated ideas, not originators of ideas. I, I have no pride on that fact.

Pod: I mean then from the mindset of the leader, like if I think about the notion of curating ideas elsewhere, it goes to a sense of.

I then therefore can’t have all the ideas like this. There’s a lack of ego in that sense. He could talk some more about that in terms of how you’ve either evolved that prior to V or I was never there maybe to begin with.

Helen: Yeah, look, I think that’s never been a problem for me thinking I have all the ideas.

I’ve had a career of making a lot of special moves, you know? More marketing product strategy and the benefit of that. I I’ve loved picking up different skills and different functional areas, but the other benefit is you actually never become a machine. I have no reliance on expertise. I’ve moved industries.

I’m constantly in learning mode and maybe that’s a freedom because. I, I don’t mean to hold on to expertise. It’s about listening. It’s about talking to the experts for me and bringing people together around ideas and, and opportunities. Seeing white space in markets and, and grabbing it doesn’t matter the market to me.

Um, it’s about, you know, listening, testing, driving into white space and market. So. Yeah, I have the benefit of no

Pod: you have given us though, is a absolute, beautiful insight into the mind of an innovator, which is to start with a hypothesis, look for why space in the market. Then we’ll go to use your phrase, find the taillights from other markets or other people. Start experimenting learn quick. And where you go that that’s that’s.

If I break it down to what you said, that’s, that’s the sort of expertise in itself. And then you’ve you brought in, uh, a skill set of listening and learning alongside them.

Helen: Yeah. Yeah, that, that would be the, well, that would be the expertise. You know, I have to get us, however, I made such dramatic changes of industry.

And I might, to me, what I do is always the same, which is what, which is spot talented people. They’re talented in, give them free. And in that, bring them together, galvanize them around a higher purpose. That’s what I do. I watch the numbers constantly while we do that, you know, I that’s, that’s my skill set.

It actually doesn’t change by industry or the content.

Pod: It sounds like that’s the core content of a future course. RMI MIT

Helen: leading through disruption. Yeah, I hate these negative words we use for the world we live in because it’s disruption, but it’s massive opportunity rates. So it’s all about mindset, isn’t it? Yes. So

Pod: let’s jump to something you, you touched a few seconds ago on this, the role of CEO and the chair and the relationship.

Now you’re an interesting position that you are a CEO reporting to a board and a chair. You ought to sit on a board and have C and I have sat on other boards and CEOs reporting to you. I’m interested in that. How does this two sides of the question? How does the CEO really helped to build the relationship between them and the board and likewise, the opposite.

How does the board help the CEO so that therefore the both levels of leadership are working together.

Helen: You know, at its best. And I’m, I’m incredibly lucky because my board that I said own is also an incredibly collaborative, supportive space between CEO and board. It feels like very much a team working on problems together. And that’s how my board I report to feels like. So I’m in a very lucky place. I know it’s not always the environment that you find yourself in, in a board.

How have we created that? I think full transparency, radical transparency about numbers. And, you know, a board meeting is not a performance to me. It’s a problem-solving session in both in both of these environments, I’m working in different roles. And you know, when it’s that, of course it has a governance aspect and, uh, you know, Holding to account aspect.

Of course, that’s, that’s part of your legal responsibility as a director and my responsibility as a CEO to, you know, report back and show the progress against goals. And so on, of course, there’s that formal piece, but much more in the atmosphere and in the working relationships is to play to everyone’s strengths and.

Uh, ask for input on problems, you know, and to hide problems, not hide that problems. And I think that sort of transparency and the environment in the boardroom really helps, you know, us be all conscious of what, what are the knowns, what are the unknowns and where are we taking risks versus, you know, and, and how much are we prepared to risk?

So I find that, and, and the second part of your question as to the difference in the roles, Aye. I think in a sense that it’s a collaboration as similar roles in your all great minds in a room, trying to try to crack them. But what I find as a board member versus a person that drives the business every day is the leavers are big, but you don’t pull them very often.

So in some senses, You know, every day as a CEO, as a running, anyone running an operation, you’re tweaking, you’re, you’re, you’re adjusting constantly. Right. And, and there’s a thousand things you’re doing. Whereas I think as a board member, there’s only a few things you do, but they’re very big decisions, you know, it’s a yes, no, on a big investment or it’s an, all the thinking and decision making that goes into that, or, uh, You know, when to raise money or, you know, they’re big, they’re big lasers.

And so I think what I. What I feel the difference is is, is you have to be very careful on when you pull those leaders. You know, it’s not, it’s not about just having an opinion in that room. It’s really, really carefully considering all the elements and all the possible consequences of moving a lever and being very conscious that you shouldn’t move down for the sake of it.

That it’s largely down to the management team to make all the little tweaks. And, and if you’re pulling a lever, you really need to think about it carefully and consider all the options and perhaps not be. It’s a slower thought process, I suppose, go slow to go.

Pod: coming to mind. As you were describing that in terms of how, how does the director stay abreast of everything they need to stay abreast of, but subtly, subtly encouraged or nudge as opposed to, as you said, pull big Libras on a regular basis. So again, it goes to a very mindful relationship in terms of the more transparent you can be together.

The less leverage you have to pull on, on, on regular basis. Yes.

Helen: Yeah. Was going on to my first board. It was a not-for-profit for many years. I was at seek and I consulted one of our board members at seek. And he he’s a very wise, very experienced board member. He’s written and government’s books put it there.

And he’s said it’s as important when you don’t speak as when you speak. And I think that was, you know, like sort of hit me like a clunk of yes. It’s, it’s not a performance. It’s, it’s really adding value when you open your mouth and maybe it won’t add value. You don’t need to pick up every point. Yeah. I think it’s a very mindful process actually.

Pod: That’s there’s a lot of wisdom in that comment. You don’t have to speak every time. Yeah. Right. Right. I love that. We hope you’re enjoying this episode of the leadership diet. Feel free to hit the subscribe button on whatever podcast player you are listening to this on reviews on iTunes and Spotify are greatly appreciated.

I want to jump to leadership teams. I know that M you you’ve already said to us, but our MIT, the organization has grown enormously in three years of being there. And in a previous role that you were in as the country head for inverter and another digital marketplace business, you also developed and scaled a leadership team there.

Can you talk us through the way you think about teams and the way you think about scaling teams and the experience you’ve had in that space?

Helen: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, what a privilege, both of those roles invited. It was actually, it was global. It was the market places globally, and those times really didn’t have the executive place.

So it was very much just the hitting massive scale up at, in Barstow. And there wasn’t, you know, there wasn’t even a marketing team or product in yet, so really was able to design and then build. And hire most of the team and my T only one person was already there. It is now my executive seven. So it was go.

So it’s an amazing privilege and quite a, I suppose, responsibility for the coaching you have in the future. I always think the people you hire today, company, you have in three years time, you know, it is an incredibly important decision and your leaders of course at the time and the pace for everything.

So. Yeah, I guess one of my lessons on it do it very, very carefully. I mean, I took my time and I really put people through a lot of paces when I’m hiring senior roles, you know, case studies and meeting a lot of people and so on. So just incredibly important decisions, looking also at the mix of the team.

So that’s the beauty of doing it, you know, over a year, say. Building most of them exerting. Yep. You really can. And of course, when you replace people later, as, as, as you have smaller gaps, really looking at the mix across the team and that there is the black hat and the yellow and so on, and all the ways that you diversify thinking in that team and then galvanizing that team together, I think that is actually the hardest bit finding I find hiring.

Talented people are really rewarding process. I think pulling those talents together and making sure it’s a team is the most challenging thing about running the exec team and really being able to invest in that time together, you know, go away for a couple of days together. And some of those things are the other thing I would say has always paid off, you know, Relationship trust, really knowing each other and being able to call each other robustly and then call me as well on disagreements or, or behaviors is the most powerful kind of practices I’ve heard.

Pod: So does this, these three things are out. I would like just to go back and double dip on, because I think there’s some inherent wisdom there that sits beneath it. The notion of. You said, I put people through a paces and case studies, et cetera. Now, if you’re hiring someone for an exec team, they’re already are talented.

They already are technically strong. Otherwise they wouldn’t even be in your interview room. So what are you looking for when you’re doing something like a case study? Is it that the way they think is the way they approach? Is it, is there something you’re looking for that may be less obvious to the person doing the case study?

 

Helen: Look, yes, CV’s  are always  strong rIght,when you’re looking at senior roles, but capability in Executive is often less so, in my experience.

 Let’s say it’s a tech director, you’re a CTO.

A lot of strong CVS in technical skills. I’m not even the person to test technical skills, but I am testing the Exec skills. So how well can you translate your technology strategy into a company strategy.

How can you participate as a decision making body in Exec?

How much did you understand your user needs when you were building that technology that I actually think is often not apparent in CV’s, been hard to get an interviews, and that is the stuff that makes a great executive.

Their ability to communicate okay.

Their strategy and link it to the company goals and mission. Their ability to communicate full stop their self-awareness on mistakes they’ve made. So it’s never a case. So of course it’s never about being right. Yes. But the horsepower in the process of getting to the answer and being self-awareness and exploration.

Of their decision-making process and getting there that is really worth testing because that’s an, a good exac or a good functional person.

Pod: I always have, we both seen great functional leaders promote an exec team, and then they flounder because they, they, they just keep doing their functional role and then that’s all they know how to do or even want to do sometimes.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think you said if you wanted to go was taking time to go away and really get to know each other. Now there’s, there’s always commentary about that notion of spending time to get as religious team and getting to know each other. What are some of the benefits you found over your experience of scaling different types of teams?

Because you’ve, you’ve invested that time in getting to know each other.

Helen: You know, one of the, one of the fundamental things for high performance to me, and I know proven in research, I’m sure you have plenty is, you know, a feedback culture, for example. I think great feedback and really robust feedback requires trust to be in place and psychological safety to be in place first, before you can hear it.

And before you’re brave enough to give it in any direction, you know, up or down. So I think that the key thing is that you build relationship and that, that builds knowledge of each other and, you know, awareness of each other’s. Hot buttons and so on, which helps you, you know, work well together. But fundamentally it’s about building trust so bad.

You are in a safe enough place with each other to be able to be really robust. And if that trust isn’t in place, I think, I think you’re pussyfooting about, um, the heart issue. So on the, they always say no, and you know, I’m just going to have to bulldoze them or go around them. No, we need a conversation around why you saying no?

And you know, How do we make this work better, be more positive engagement? You know, whatever the situation is, you need that trust and look, you know, I love my food and wine and, and I think you’re sharing these things. Is part of being human and, and, you know, enjoying life together is a really wonderful way to just get out of the transactional and into the relationship that is so important to making teams work and fly.

Pod: Somebody has said up front that people might have skipped over. You said psychological trust being placed. For me to receive feedback and for us to be brave enough to give it, but you start over to receive feedback. Most people want to talk about feedback. Oh yeah. I need to get courageous on how to give it.

And they underestimate how hard it is to receive it. And yet that’s where you started.

Helen: Yes. Now I’ve got an incredible chief student experience. Officer has been a coach and she has a great technique where we all sit around in a circle and. Gifts, one of the people feedback and I’m actually the worst. It takes, especially positive.

I just find that excruciating sitting there and hearing good things I’ve done. I just, I just want to dive in a hole. So yeah, I’ve learned that about myself through that teammate. It’s really hard to receive, especially positive.

Pod: So G given the success, you’ve had our last three years, it sounds like you’re getting lots of excrutiatingly positive feedback,

Helen: made lots of mistakes, too.

Pod: I’m interested in someone who is so relationship oriented and as long as I’ve known you, that’s certainly one of your over. Traits is that you’re, you’re a huge believer in relationship building. What does it mean like as a CEO working during COVID, where you don’t have face-to-face and you, you are relying on video based technology relationships.

And of course, as I said, our fund Melbourne being. And an elongated locked down process. What’s that been like for you? And I suppose there’s two aspects of the question. One is the CEO in terms of the role of CEO and how you keep the organization together. And then two, as the person that’s Helen, who was a very relationship oriented person.

Helen: Yeah. Well, Yeah, everyone knows. It’s, it’s really challenging to keep the social connection in the same way that you can. I just, the thing I missed, absolutely the most is walking the floor. As I used to at least twice a day, I had gaps in my diary to just walk the floors and chat with whoever was around and set.

You know, you can read faces, you can read body language, you can see a team’s looking tense with each other. That I can’t, I have not found a way for a place. I’m doing a million things, everything from a weekly video where, you know, sometimes yeah, it’s a business update, but sometimes actually I’ve done an update on, you know, resilience and what I do to stay mentally strong through.

This time or it’s about my reconciliation journey with indigenous Australia, whatever the topic, just lots of communication. That way we have a coffee related system that we get randomly matched on Slack with people across the business for a cup of coffee. We do that anyway, but we’ve really upset and I’ve created a CEO roulette where I just bring six people from across the business and we just chat about what’s worrying us.

What’s exciting us, whatever. And these. Just trying a million things basically to keep that informal relationship happening and the cross team, what I’ve found, I don’t know about you, but teams themselves have actually, in some cases got stronger. They’re doing daily stand ups. They’re, they’re looking after each other.

Their communication is constant and strong, but the cross team collaboration is a nightmare because you don’t necessarily meet all the time. And so those spontaneous connections are getting weaker and weaker. And so I’m just doing a million things, but I have not been able to replace the walk, the floor.

I just haven’t. And I miss it. Yes,

Pod: I bet. I bet. And I like, I’m hearing the same thing from many organizations and need some of the ones that are working in myself. The intact teams have found many different and sometimes hilariously innovative ways of staying, staying in touch. And I suspect that’ll become part of their.

Normal way going forward, because it’s been so fun on many, many levels, but the cross functional teams that would just meet in the corridors or in, in a whole of company meeting or in the canteen or coffee shop or whatever, that’s, that’s gone at the moment because there was no reason to meet. And so, yes, there’s I saw somebody that he said to me, the sense of who am I, part of, I’m definitely part of my own team.

I’m definitely proud of this big brand. Cause I know I am, but who else is in the brand assignment team? I don’t know any more. Cause I haven’t seen them in six months and that’s the product is missing.

Helen: Yeah. Yeah. And for newbies and that’s just another whole conversation that we’ve had 20 new starters and they’ve never, they didn’t even interview in the office.

They really don’t know what our culture is. So trying to give them a flavor of that. I’ve done, you know, old photo montages of parties we’ve had because we’ve always had a great party. Culture celebrate success can culture. And, you know, we’ve actually gone back to some of those things. I mean, you know, just to or talked about the things that were missing from the office or recently, which caused a gorgeous conversation with, you know, the goofy things that actually kinda mess economists and so on.

Just trying to give me a visa. The fact we don’t take ourselves too seriously. There is there Israel connection and a lot of fun being had and interim be done. It

Pod: will be heading again again. Absolutely.

Can I share the topic completely. You have had an, any career in the digital world and particularly in marketplaces in digital worlds, he worked with some of the biggest brands seek who were on the largest Korean marketplace companies in the world. And certainly in, in Australia, um, and Vata, we mentioned a few minutes ago in terms of digital graphic design, and then those kinds of areas at sea, of course, the international crafts organization and our MIT.

I’m interested in two things I’m interested in. Your own leadership and how that has evolved over those roles as he transitioned into bigger and bigger roles. And I’m interested in how does someone be very successful in the digital world consistently across different brands and different companies like you have.

So maybe let’s start with the leadership evolution for me. Mm mm.

Helen: No, it’s always so very, very the actual progression. I mean, it’s had its periods of acceleration. I think going from marketing to inviter my first GM role in massive growth and a huge amount to be done, you know, building a team from scratch while, you know, sort of, we used to joke LaMer laying the tracks while the high speed trains running was certainly a period of massive acceleration and handling, uh, a board and so on.

And so the first time. Yeah. In many ways it’s felt a natural progression. So I’m not sure what to say. I think, you know, you accumulate skills over the years. And I did a lot of lateral moves. I did product strategy marketing, even in marketing, at seek. I was doing a lot of extension projects to prepare for GM.

So I, I ran product there for while I moved to them to an agile methodology, which required working deeply with the tech team. So I was already. You know, the best career advice I ever got was if you do the job you want, if you want to be a generalist manager and you’re in marketing, start doing other projects.

And that’s exactly what I did. And so in many ways I was already, I had quite a few of the muscles, I suppose, having moved around a lot, I’d done strategy, et cetera, pulling them all together at speed. Was, you know, certainly a, a challenging time. And probably the hardest thing was, was getting enough relationships in place with that much speed and so much to be done.

That was probably, that was the hardest thing because I do, I always tend to have with bosses. Everyone around me, you know, my best operating style is a strong relationship to then be able to push things pretty hard. Cause I do push things pretty hard. I’ve always worked in high growth, so that requires a lot of forward momentum and you may be able to come with you and you can’t be busy footing around.

So. Yeah, that’s PR that’s probably the most challenging periods, but in many ways, a natural transition to, you know, it’s not as hard

Pod: as it sounds. Well, I think of what you said, Helen. You’re, you’re, you’re on a consistent learning path. You, you enjoy learning. So you, you, you also keep a very open mind and, and, and you seek either projects or roles or areas to lean into and learn from.

Have you, have you changed any part of your. Thinking patterns or leadership patterns over time, as you have learned new roles or moved into bigger roles. Hmm.

Helen: Oh, mature and needing to be in self-management. I mean, I think that is the biggest journey. You know, if you say 10 years old, what are the muscles that have developed itself moderation, observing myself, recognizing this isn’t working.

Adjust rather than continuing to use web style, for example, you know, so for example, I’m a passionate person which serves me well, you know, I’m, I’m really committed to my end users, to my team. That’s a really strong and good muscle, but it’s a dangerous muscle in some debates because it gets to being a bulldozer and a conversation to being too.

Or at least appearing emotional in a conversation, which might not serve me in some environments. And so, so moderating, knowing this is a strength, passion can be, you know, in a team meeting, it can be as passionate as I like that in a boardroom, not so much. You know, it looks smarter. I let’s, let’s make sure I’m giving space to the whole room, et cetera.

So I think myself moderation has been my biggest journey and it’s constantly still my work. Yeah.

Pod: Have you processed that you now use regularly to either proactively remind yourself to amplify or to quieten down because of the environment I’m going in. I’m just trying to wonder how do you moderate yourself compared to when you didn’t.

Yeah. It’s

Helen: it’s, it’s, it’s hard to know, isn’t it? Cause you build over time, but I think, I think slow down. I think I, I slow it down. I stopped speaking, you know, and as soon as you realize this, there’s a talking and I must admit I’m not so disciplined about that. In my working team. So, you know, there’s a lot of talking over each other at times we’re working on it.

But certainly if I’m in a high stakes, you know, board or meeting with some of the heads of college at the uni, some of my really high stakes industry partners, and there is. Talking, you know, agitated talking or talking over happening, I’ve learned to stop, you know, that’s that is, that should not be happening.

Right. Slow it down and need to change the pace. And I need to change my pace. Even speaking slower. Yeah. Some of those, yeah. Self-management techniques. I think those are the main ones

Pod: I probably use. I think there are great examples. And certainly that, that board member that you took advice from when you were at seek about moving into your first board role and his, his, his, I think it was a, his, you said, um, gave you advice in terms of you don’t always have to speak.

That’s a real wisdom there, and I’ve certainly noticed over the years as leaders get more experienced. And they move into senior roles. They get far better at picking. And when, when do I add value or when do I let, just let it go. Or as you said, when do I slow down the conversation? Which means I’ve got to slow down my speaking, which then helps the whole conversation slow down.

And it’s a really powerful technique, but it requires awareness to begin with. And then the act of process of moderation as you’re doing. Yeah. We’ve been developing those, uh, to great effect over the last number of years.

Helen: Always a journey, but I’m working on it

Pod: maybe before we come to a conclusion soon, I wanted to jump into what might be a big topic.

I must have surely see where we go to buy notice one this year that you’re very passionate about, and that is let’s use the term gender politics for that, for the want of a better term. And I’m sure I’m sure it is a fry better terms than that one. But I noticed an article that our MIT put out reset. It was last week.

The advice to women to lean in, be more confident. It doesn’t help and the data shows it. And it’s a really interesting article that effectively says, you know, women who express a higher, strong sense of achievement, motivation. I a yes, we can get X done. Don’t necessarily get the same rates of promotion as, as men might do.

Tell us more about that and then tell us some of the views you have in this area. Cause I know it’s something you think a lot about.

Helen: Yeah. Look, it’s a dangerous one. I, I, I loved it. Oh my God. Yes. Like, you know, is it about women changing or is it about unconscious bias? You know, in my early career I was told I’d never make an exec because I was far to expressive.

Pod: I know

Helen: what they say. I know I’ve got a slightly quirky personality. I didn’t look like this boys at the exec table at the time, you know, in my career, there was often no women in the, in the leadership team, but is it about, is it always about you changing your personality or is it about recognizing the strengths of diversity and.

Understanding that it doesn’t necessarily look like you and truly deep work on unconscious bias. Is it, I mean, everyone needs it. I need it for, for the areas I’m blind to culturally. And I thought it was very interesting research on that front. That. We need to be really careful. Of course, I’m a big believer in feedback culture, and I’ve needed a bunch of feedback, including perhaps to tone down my quirkiness in some environments, not to say that there isn’t very valid feedback in most feedback.

But do women need to change or do our environments need to open up to different and diverse styles? And there’s amazing power to that. Diversity, you know, the thrusting sort of command and control old style management is actually a thing of the past. And women were often prejudiced against for being maybe soft or empathy or, or bringing their teams with them.

You know, the research has caught up with us on this actually command and control is not the most powerful servant leadership is the most effective leadership style that looks different to thrusting, you know, commanding control to style. And guess what? Women are really good at it. They have a natural desire to serve people and natural empathy.

And so. It’s such important work and, and one that I, I think we’re all on a journey on culturally with diverse religious and cultural backgrounds. It’s not just about gender. We miss out on a huge number of talented people and the best they can give. If we don’t understand that unconscious bias and yeah, it’s alive and well today it’s alive

Pod: today, but it’s, it’s, I think it’s a really timely article that came out from our MIT and this, given that over the weekend, just in our denim was reelected back into New Zealand.

And she certainly is someone who would suggest by her own words that she doesn’t want to portray a. Trusting type leadership style. And in fact, the word kindness is a huge part of her own way of thinking. And certainly she has a one product appears to be a landslide in New Zealand. And if you look at the way she led join some big crisis, not just COVID, but also in the cross church massacre, extraordinary sense of empathy and strongly sense of listening to understand.

And that’s been validated by the New Zealand people by looks of it in terms of the recent election.

Helen: Yeah, and it’s not WIC, whereas blunts that might’ve been perceived, you know, to show emotion too. It’s actually strong and look how strong she was on COVID. She locked down that country that hardest in the world.

I think, you know, old fashioned judgments of some of these strengths need to change. And I think, you know, with such a polarized person that brings people together and galvanizes a nation at a time where you could have had a polarizing. You know, step in the wrong direction, shootings like that and, and hate crimes.

You know what an extraordinary

example,

Pod: ma’am, I’m always a bit reluctant to use politics as, as a, as a way to look for from leadership lessons, because it’s such a different environment to the one that you and I would normally operate in, but certainly you can see a whole lot of different versions of leadership applying today in terms of how countries and, and different leaders are using COVID or, or.

Crimes like massive presence sets on how leadership is being portrayed. I would agree with you. Two sentence version seems to be very positive and very successful in terms of, of, of a good outcome for everybody. And in that regard, it actually underlines going back to the very first conversation we had today.

And underlined rarely the lateral moves you’ve made has forced you to listen well and learn well from other people and galvanize people around. Here’s the problem we’re trying to solve. And how do we do that together? And how do we learn from each other as the starting point that goes back down to a lack of ego and the thrusting male leadership in his historical sense is full of ego.

And I think once your support, your aligning you today is innovation requires a lack of ego and an amplified version of learning and listening.

Helen: Yeah. I mean, I wouldn’t say I have no ego. I think to lead into back yourself, you need some to stand on that stage and say, we’re going this way, crossing your fingers behind your back, you know, Joan confidence.

But yeah, that balance that balance for sure.

Pod: Brilliant. And then I got two questions to bring our conversation to a close today. The first one that I ask everybody and do the second one I ask everybody is the first one is given all the wisdom you’ve accumulated. Now in your life, what would you tell the 35 year old version of yourself?

Helen: I would say, don’t worry. You will have a child and you will be a CEO panicking about boats,

Pod: I think would apply to a small number of people.

Helen: That’s brilliant. Yeah,

that would give me. Is don’t hold on too tight. My husband does rock climbing and says, there’s literally a phenomenon where you hold too tight to the rock and it fatigues your hands. And I think it is the most beautiful. And you can drop, you get so fatigued. And I think that is a beautiful analogy for leading and so career goals and everything, but yes, have them.

Dare to know you can do anything, but don’t hold on too tight. Just a soft touch is more

Pod: effective. I think. Brilliant. And you may know I’m a huge music fan, so I’m always intriguing to people’s views of music and their, what attracts them. What would be your favorite song or favorite band?

Helen: Got the risk of getting a label over my head.

Helen Reddy died a couple of weeks ago, so I’ve got to say I am warm. I don’t, I watched me grow in numbers too big to ignore as I spread my loving arms across. I got to go with that

Pod: one. Well, we’ll definitely have that in the show notes. We might even have that in the, uh, as we exit the show today, Helen, it’s been a pleasure talking to you again.

Thank you so much for making time. Congrats on the amazing success at our MIT for you and your team. Thanks, Amanda. Appreciate you being here.

Helen: Awesome. Great to speak with you, Patrick.

Pod: Hope you enjoy that conversation with Helen from a coaching perspective, Helen has raised, I think, some great topics to take away and reflect upon the first one is. That struck me at least is the amount of lateral moves she has made in her career. Going from law, into marketing, into product development within the digital sector, into GM roles, across a graphic design industry that she had never been in before into craft design and marketplace.

And now into education. She told us that that taught her to never hold on to expertise. And in fact, her expertise became one of listening, learning and curious. My own career was autistic similar in that I moved across many different sectors, originally working in cardiac surgery, intensive care hospitals and units in London to what I’m doing today.

And I would also agree with her that when you move careers across different industries, you are forced to listen. To learn and to work with curiosity. So I suppose the first question I have for all of us listen today is how do you expand your own sense of curiosity into areas that you’ve never worked in?

What can you learn from other roles or other jobs or other functions, even in your own organization that you haven’t worked in before? What can you take from that? How can that amplify your skills? The second thing I took from our Cole and conversation with Helen today was the whole notion of innovation.

And we quoted a question that bill Gates says is his most important question. I E when solving problems he looks for, who has done this before elsewhere, what can we learn from them? Alan talked about. The fact that she moved careers meant that she had to learn quickly from other places and bring experience from other places with her.

That’s why she outlined the notion of starting with a hypothesis in terms of our marketplace hypothesis, looking for trail lines or clues from other people who have solved similar problems elsewhere, sometimes in different sectors and curating those ideas from elsewhere. Looking for some white space in the market to potentially play in experiment and look for what’s the best user experience I can offer.

In this white space in this sector and then experiment and innovate. And the success she’s had in many different markets has been consistent over a long period of time. But in this example, she talked about RMI T tripling his revenue in a three-year period and expanding his team from a team of 20 to over 230.

So clearly something is working right. So the question here again is what can I take from elsewhere? What problems am I trying to solve at the moment that potentially somebody in a different sector, different industry, a different city, a different country, a different team has solved before and how can I go to them to figure out what they have done?

Not that I might actually copy exactly what they’ve done. But I can learn as to how they figured out what to do, and maybe those principles might apply and how I’m trying to solve my problem. So how do I go elsewhere? Indeed. In a previous episode with Dr. Paul Lawrence, he talked about different levels of thinking, and he said that a second order level of thinking means I would always go elsewhere to figure out who has done what, before, how I can learn from them.

And that’s a basis of innovation.

Helen: Okay.

Pod: the third thing that she talked about is scaling teams. And she gave us a great example of how, when she’s hiring for the executive team, she is less interested in their day functional expertise, because if they wouldn’t be in the conversation with her. Without that to begin with, she’s far more interested in candy, extrapolate their functional expertise and apply that across the executive team to think like an executive think at an enterprise level.

My experience of working at many executive teams over a 15 year period now is that a lot of executives and a lot of executive teams. Fail to raise their potential because some executives are still operating as a functional technical leader, as opposed to an executive leader. And Helen told us that her success in at least two different organizations in scaling global leadership teams was because you took an inordinate amount of time to make sure that the perspective person she was hiring was able to work at an executive level.

As opposed to just their functional team.

Lastly, can we talk about a servant leadership? She really amplify the notion of diversity and thinking in a diverse way and looking for quirkiness, which means if someone is in your group, Your team, your perspective team, and they don’t quite fit in that might be because they are diverse in the way they’re thinking or the background that they’re bringing all this sense of personal quirkiness.

So how do we expand ourselves to welcome that? To open the doors to diversity and diversity way of thinking, as opposed to automatically, uh, maybe con consciously having a bias against what doesn’t look like, what we’ve always done. Certainly in my own life, I continually strive to try to understand folks who think very differently to me, just so I can understand what I don’t understand.

Doesn’t mean. I always agree with the points of view, but I’m still trying to learn how people think differently. And then therefore, where does that land? It doesn’t always work, but it’s certainly a practice worth cultivating. Thank you for listening to another episode of the leadership diet. We hope you enjoyed it.

Head over to www.thedishofdiet.com, where you can subscribe to the podcast to our blogs and retrieve the show notes. From each episode. Every show note has links to whatever resources were mentioned by our guests, including their favorites. Song or band. And the best way you can support this podcast is by subscribing and sharing it with your colleagues and friends.

So they can hear the insights from our guests as well. Thank you.

Or download as a PDF:

Ep 18. The benefits of leaving your CEO role and taking a sabbatical

Eduardo Thuler took the courageous decision to leave a CEO role and take his family on almost a year-long sabbatical. How wonderful and scary at the same time! In this episode we discuss
 
  • What led to him deciding he was no longer the best person for the CEO role
  • How he managed that transition
  • What he learned about teaching kids and why he is not going to become a teacher!
  • The insights gained from visiting multiple countries
  • His experience as a new CEO and managing executives who are better than him in their functional areas
  • What he is bringing into his new role
 

Transcript

Eduardo: Thank you very much for having me.

Pod: It’s great to see you again. Now this is a, an interview at leaders about leadership and I, ain’t going to start in a very different place with you, many people dream of taking a 10 month sabbatical, but few people realize that yes, you held a CEO role when you decided to do just that.

Tell us how to someone arrive at a decision to take 10 months off and travel the world.

Eduardo: It was a very intense decision. I think the main reason to get there was the CEO drums, a very demanding job. So, from the emotional perspective, there was some tiredness that were between four and five years. From, at some point I realized that taking a break and having more time with a family would be a great way to reenergize.

Also, from the job perspective, I felt like it was probably adding less to the job. Over the years. So, helping a new person take that position would probably be the best thing for the company. So, there was some soul searching, some work with my potential successors, some discussions of the company that the investors and we got to this good plan.

So I had a somewhat long. It took me six months to get ready to go. In the meantime I started dreaming of the trip, but it was a very good experience.

Pod: Very courageous thing. You’ve just admitted there. The idea that you recognize that maybe you were adding less value and then maybe it’s time for you to vacate the role and that same time be very honest and transparent with the organization so he can get a successor in place. It seems like a very transparent conversations you had leading up to your decision to vacate.

Eduardo: I think. I read this great topic that the higher up the hierarchy chain you get, the more importantly is the self-awareness.

I think self-awareness can disrupt a lot. So this idea that you keep thinking about what are the key next steps for the company and how can you help with them or important and better understanding? Capital’s business was one of the good things I think, added to the business, but at some point the execution.

For the steps ahead was just something that I think I could help with, but it was probably not the best person.

Pod: I’m still intrigued by this because when you and I were chatting earlier, you were talking about the Italian word for Saturday and how David’s sabbatical came out of that notion. So when you and your family decided to go on sabbatical, what were you hoping to do? And then what did you actually.

Eduardo: I think the two key elements we’re looking for was to spend more time as a family. So to have more time, have your kids is now 10. The other one is eight, so they were a year and a half younger.

And I just want the truth to have time with them. But I knew that if it was to be just inside the house with probably not have great experiences. So doing this in some place that could create new conversations, that experience was key. And the other piece was actually getting to know the world, getting in a seven and nine year old to travel between countries, different languages.

Different cultures was a very energizing thing for me to help them do so I really enjoyed it. So I think those were the two key things I trying to get out of it.

Pod: And where did you guys actually get to over the time

Eduardo: we began in South Africa, we roughly spent a month per country, a little bit less or more in different countries, but we began in South Africa, Thailand, Vietnam, ship ban, Hong Kong, China.

And then we came to Europe beginning with Italy. And Portugal and Spain

Pod: amazing. Now, since you’ve come back, a lot of the world has gone into lockdown and many families have had to do education at home. Whereas in your case, you took it on the road, you and your wife took on your education of your children while you were traveling.

What was that like?

Eduardo: It’s a lot harder than I expected. And I think my respect for teachers didn’t increase over time. I had this plan that I researched a little bit, the idea of homeschooling. I got some ideas out of it. And I thought that just being with them and meeting my passion should them. Cause they really liked to learn what would make it work.

Anyway, that was the part I worked was that I thought that having a few books, especially your math and Portuguese, cause they really wanted them to keep the speed with just the math mindset, being good with numbers and dealing with them and reading and writing. I thought those were key and it’s not just taking books be meaningful.

What I learned over time is that. Because I had two kids at different rates with different books, the whole notion of a group discussing the same topic never came up. So I was trying to teach to kids and different types of content and it really didn’t work out. Having frustrated kids just saying that there’s not.

That was not a nice, they will not energize by. It was very, it very

Pod: imagine kids learning away from other kids is also more difficult either. there’s the social context of kids learning together often and accelerates the learning. I would imagine.

Eduardo: Yeah, we had this ideal that we’ll get them to learn through kids.

The only place that really worked was in Italy. Where they did go to an Italian public school for about 10 days and they loved it. They still talk about that experience. It was the last 10 days before vacation. So they got to experience the feeling of leaving the last year and be happy with vacations.

Pod: When you look back now at that extraordinary family event, what’s been the best experience you took over those 10 months from a family point of view.

Eduardo: I think the shared experiences, the notion that we’re a special family, And there was this connection between us, where we can think of what it was like in Thailand, where we had this big house with a pool.

On the other hand in Vietnam, we had this very small apartment where the rats watch the round, but it’s just safe. And we went through all of them and things were well. I think it both created a strong bind and a sense that we can cross each other, that things are going to be all right. And I think during the pandemic is probably helpful for us as a family to have gone through so many things that just feel like another being experience.

Pod: Yeah. Yeah. Amazing. So when you look back now and I’ll jump back into your corporate career in a few minutes, but when you look back now, is there any insights that you’ve created or gathered or fell into over that 10 month period that is now helping you in your leadership role?

Eduardo: Yeah, I think the key, I got this idea that I would read about the kosher in each country and stop by.

So I have this book collection about the different countries, and I probably read more than half of those 10 books about Japan, about China and engage them this and try and see in the streets and in the restaurants. And they experienced rehab. How the sculpture of salt Lake, I think got me a lot more sensitive to the culture topic overall, and now moving to a different country, leading people from different countries in Portugal, but dealing with presentence Portuguese.

And there’s a merit that just coming by Argentinians being able to manage them all, both. In looking at in the lead roles and then specific needs, but also getting assessed some cultural issues in my reading affects some of the things that come by and portrait in Brazil, even though Portugal colonized Brazil, there’s a lot of difference between the two camps.

I think it’s the sensitivity to cultural issues is really helpful.

Pod: Does broaden the mind just from the experience alone. But I think what you were saying to us as you, you went through that experience very mindfully in order to make sure you were aware of different cultures, not just experienced them, but to learn, how to, how you lead through them later on, which is what you’re now doing.

Eduardo: Yep. And now I’m reading more good books on actually measuring the difference between cultures in different countries. And it does map wild idea that. Asians are very different from Westerners. And I think our mind has that, but once you get into the details, there’s a lot more nuance. Interesting.

Pod: And of course there’s a huge history of Japanese selling in Brazil. So that’s how I’ll see a culture you were familiar with. But I would imagine going there and living there for awhile would have given you a more intensive understanding of the Japanese culture.

Eduardo: And Japan is a great journey. One of the things is I think most people when gadget, Tokyo, or interesting about the cities in Japan, you get the sense of everything is so clean.

Everything’s so neat. The stuff they produce is so small and then with care, everything is so nice. I even heard this description from other Brazilian person that had the experience and said, it feels like a different society, a more evolved one, but then I got to understand more that. The importance the group has in Japan is higher.

On the other hand, that means individual have a little less leeway. They have a little less space and looking at the trade-offs was a very interesting way to see the culture.

Pod: Fantastic. Fantastic.

So let’s jump back into your role right before you left to go on that fantastic sabbatical. When I first met you, I think you had taken on the CEO role of Cathal in Brazil. And for those who don’t know, Catho is the largest marketplace in the employment sector in Brazil, similar to organizations like seek or indeed, or those kinds of organizations.

And you had joined Catto after you had been working in Google in California. So I’m interested in your first role as CEO, you came into Catho, you had a lot of product leadership experience, but now suddenly you’ve taken over a sales and marketing organization and product experience. What was that like for you stepping into that CEO role?

Because if you think back to your first couple of months, what was that like for you?

Eduardo: Is very challenging. I think there’s so many areas. I was very comfortable with tech world. I can product breezy. I think strategy was effective and I have been discussing strategy through product for awhile, but having somebody who was much stronger in strategy than me was a new thing.

And leading that person is a big challenge, but I think this stretch got much larger when you think of people overall. So the HR function. And legal and finance, 10 sales and marketing.

 I think the key challenge for in general management  is how do you manage somebody who’s usually better than you at what they do? How can you add value to your conversations? How can you help them as a leader, if they probably have a better sense of most of the things in their day to day activities. And since we’re talking about senior leaders, not only they are better, they know they’re better! So it’s not like it’s an easy conversation…

they feel like, Oh, I’m glad you’re helping me. If you don’t ask, it’s actually getting their way. They tell you to go away and. Doing that within having a force, respectful conversations and deciding how to work together. And when to say, even though, better, that’s what you’re doing. I need you to be a little less good in marketing, because from the company perspective, for example, marketing might become less important over time.

So I think. The challenge of managing senior people in different functions. I think that was the key lesson and a very challenging, I loved learning about it. I think it’s a topic I really enjoy, but it’s a big challenge.

Pod: You said two things that are really important, one is the functional technical expertise or that leader in terms of strategy or marketing or sales.

And how do you add value there? And then also, how do you get your mindset around? I’m leading someone who is. Far better than I would ever be in this function. And they know that and I am their leader. So how did you overcome that challenge or what was the transition for you as you overcame that? I think the

Eduardo: key learning is first get the right people.

On the bus. There’s a book that’s using this question. I’m loving it. Just get the right people on board. Even though you might have people who are very strong at specific function, they don’t like the mission. If they don’t think the values don’t match, if they’re just not energized by the direction you’re taking, you probably need different people.

So helping those people, self-select either helping them understand this is not the role for me or telling them that you’re going to look for somebody else so that the people selecting, I think was a key function. The second one is just culture. Even though the people function has the role of telling the company about culture and defining the, but the mission of kosher what’s the mission of this company.

What we were looking for was a joint exercise. So I had support all of those leaders in the same room and discuss until we got to agreements on this is what we’re energized you will after. So I think most finding the right people. Creating this joint sounds through culture mission, and then getting down to the financial details.

How aggressive can we be? Is this too much? Is this about right? And we had strong budget conversations every six months or so. I think those were the exercises that created more of this joint value

Pod: for the group and Eduardo. When you look back now and yet you think of that period, you were there. how long did it take you to shift from being you’re new in the role, learning the role, recognizing that these folks are far better than I am in these areas too, when you started becoming comfortable in actually, my role is not to be the expert in the area.

My role is to help guide this whole team and I feel comfortable in doing that map.

Eduardo: Oh, just take your last sentence. I think it took me about 10 years to be comfortable with a CEO role. And since there was five hasn’t happened yet, I think the CEO role was just there’s this other book that I really like, which is.

The CTO position is unnatural. Usually people who get to this position, I used to really perform well at everything they do. When you do products, you research, you read books, you experiment, you try back and forth. You do a lot of those things several times before you need to find your mission, then you make a lot of mistakes, but it never gets you to meet again with the same group.

So you have less. Repeating directions on the same topics. And the senior role has a lot of changes over time. So when some things are working well, we get close to this and you might fire a senior manager and take his position for awhile, which is great for your children. And a little bit more about that specific function, but you’re probably not going to be great at this.

And this sense that you’re doing a bad job is both intimidating and frustrating. And then you find that neither. You got more GoPro and then something else exposed and you’ll say some other problems in return again. So this continuous discomfort, I think is one of the key elements of the CEO job. Yeah.

But I think overtime and the date at the end of the first year, I was probably feeling less. Like I don’t even have an 18 year if I’m doing the right thing, probably the end of the first year felt like a change, but I think the speed of learning. Didn’t diminish for the first three years. And from my perspective, I really like learning.

So the idea of going to all those different functions, for example, taking the key sales role in one of our business units was a big challenge. I suddenly had to drive a lot of people, but instead of just helping their senior manager to decide what to do, I was actually helping figure that out with them.

Yeah. So I think the first year, the sense of. I might not be the right person for the role starts to go away or on the second year and gets back to and change experiences all over. But I think it probably 10 years, it’s still uncomfortable during this. Maybe when I get to this training,

Pod: we hope you’re enjoying this episode of the leadership diet. Feel free to hit the subscribe button on whatever podcast player you are listening to this on reviews on iTunes and Spotify. I greatly appreciate it. One of the common themes from all the interviews I’m doing for this podcast series. But indeed the last 20 years of the work I’ve been doing anyway, working with executives is the folks who are most successful most often recognize that leaning into learning is the only way to continue to be successful.

And most CEOs that I’ve ever met or worked with recognize that the day they stop learning today to become ineffective in their role. Now, as you quite rightly said, at different phases of your role, there’s different types of learning. And if someone departs from a vacancy, you got to take on their role for three or six months, suddenly you become a deep, functional expert in that area, or at least better than you did before.

But the idea I’ve got in with a learning mindset is probably one of the most, I think, important accelerators of our success in any role, but particularly CEO role. And it sounds That’s what you brought to it is, it was, how do I keep learning and learning different things over as over time as a role progressed?

Eduardo: Yeah, I think learning is key. And I think that part was probably my, the part of my DNA that really worked well with the role. The part is really hard. I think, to balance with this humble CEO. That we would admit in front of a thousand people. We’re not sure what we’re doing, but we’ll try those two or three things.

If it doesn’t work out, we’ll figure it out. We’ll let you go next. That type of the size of newness when you’re leading a large number of people just as a work. So being able to communicate what you don’t know. In a way that doesn’t create fear or gets people paralyzed. I think that’s harder. And I think that was a tougher lesson for me, because in the beginning it was natural for me to tell people from other functions like finance or legal, we don’t really know what we’re going to do, but it will work out.

And finances

you need specific members to put in budget. We need to tell investors how much revenue you’re going to have. And I’m saying, but nobody really knows those numbers. And they saying yes, but we need to come up with the best possible answer. So the learning process of both not knowing and recognizing where we don’t know.

Deciding when and how to express what we don’t know. And when to just communicate enough, she got to comfort the other company. I think that was one of the key. Key elements of the learning process. Yeah.

Pod: Yeah. Given your background before Catho, you worked at Google in product development and of course would have had a lot of experimentation as you were developing different product areas and knowing that a lot of those ideas would naturally fail.

brought that very open, transparent embracing of. Experimentation and naturally talks the organization yet, but we don’t know everything. We’ve got to have a go see what happens. And as you said, that inspires confidence in not many people. How’s the people sitting in front of you having spoken to a lot of people in the last six months, the pandemic has also brought out the exact same learning for many leaders.

How do you instill confidence into the organization about an issue that the whole world knows that we don’t know the answer to it yet? it’s a very different, difficult scenario to get. But communicating with a sense of confidence seems to be the overarching strategy that does work, which I think you said you learned over time as you.

Eduardo: Yeah. And I think, especially with the pandemic and with that experience, what you can communicate with certainty. And I think in the pandemic tele employees overall, we look at people first, but are you going to take care of our own? And that is not going to change over time, but we don’t also going to work from home from the office, but we will make it a safe environment.

I think this type of certainty helps clear things up a little bit. Because there’s a lot. We don’t know. So focusing on what is not going to change, I think helps set those apart.

Pod: You said a few seconds ago steady in front of a thousand people. I think he said to me, once that catheter had employed a thousand plus people and you and your team took a strong view of how do we develop.

Culture, not just for the sake of it, but as a strategic leverage and leverage for the organization, what you do and what were you hoping to achieve by doing that?

Eduardo: I think it has several challenges and I think one of them was the market in which the company in the past was changing deeply. The key members for the company was marketing and mass marketing.

Which is getting a lot less effective over time with both the internet and social media people watching less TV and more YouTube. So a key lever was starting to work less and less for time. And the way you do marketing is a lot of money. And a few people’s thinking. the way you do communication in the internet world is a little bit of money spread out across a lot of people.

Also the marketing, even digital marketing was less of a strong lever. So we just had to be a lot smarter, usually through. Technology development to help people find jobs and help employers find those people. And just going deeper into the topics, the needs, the conversation just required more brains, just more brains with autonomy and ability to think, and then required a big change in culture.

It was a very interesting journey in understanding that diagnosing what were the more, the deeper elements, deciding what to communicate and the process to get there. And that’s the point that became clear the key elements to change a culture. We’ll be strong leaders across the organization. So just having me talk to a thousand people that things changed won’t work.

We need their leaders in several different layers of command. I hearing that message and living that change and the culture change is this interesting process on one hand, what you’re saying really resonates with you. You really like it, but some people don’t like it. And do you need your help to make a decision between leaving the company or deciding to experiment something they initially don’t like, and then bringing more people on board to get more momentum change.

And that doesn’t really very interesting part of the journey

Pod: three-year period that you were leading that change. What did you notice and tell the organization and of aware that go from and where did it end up before you left?

Eduardo: I think some of the milestones we expected. And we had them in a nice chart, communicated this across the executive team to set expectations.

Most of the milestones happen. So the first one is people didn’t even know we were going through a cultural change and then we told them about it. At first, they didn’t believe us. So we need you to start taking actions for them to believe this. And then when they started believing something was going to change and they had to make a decision, do I adapt to this?

Or do we give up? We went through all those elements. I thought it was gonna be clearer at each element, but it was personal. Get the concepts behind it, but it’s a very gradual change. So at some point, just look back and realize that we’ve gone through that. Now that I look back every bus, for example, everybody clearly understood change had happened.

People were fighting against it, but no one was involved anymore.

And then as you look at members like churn and people leaving the company, and I started thinking, this is wrong. And you suddenly realize maybe some of those other people that were naturally inclined to leave and just fighting churn is the wrong thing to do at this time. But dealing with the loss of people who might be talented.

It’s hard. So having prepared yourself for this strong mindset of this is part of the consequences of the cultural change was a good thing.

Pod: And then as you said up front to you, you came to conclusion that the role and you are no longer suited for each other. And in sense that you believe that you had done what you could do in an hour needed someone else or a different style of leadership or background to bring it somewhere else.

How long did it take you to get to that conclusion?

Eduardo: I think it grew on me over time, so I can really put a finger on when it began. But I started realizing my energy was a bit lower slowly. I was living a little bit, a little less than what we were doing and realizing it was not adding as much energy as much insight as I used to.

And I started becoming less excited about the monster. And doing a bit more soul searching. I think the conclusion was I expected a very big change value into the market. I expected a very big rewrite of the business, and then we, Didn’t really work out. There was a great business ahead. But with lots of last spring pension, and I think the ring was mentioned is probably what I’m more passionate about.

And when it became clear that the size of the invasion was smaller and it was more about just keeping the business in a good shape and working through the financials and getting the sales or marketing people should keep executing well and probably a bit less energy on innovation technology and still some emphasis in that, but less excited about the future.

And that doesn’t mean the company is solid and has a bright future. It’s just less, as you said, me and the job, we’re less inclined about each other at this point. And then as I realized that, because it was less excited, I would be energizing people less. I would be adding less to every job candidate that I would be.

Pitching to come to the word, I would be just putting less specialists. I realize having somebody else with more of that profile was probably a good thing to do in those six months. I still think of the key elements of reinvention that would be in our future. And I think that thought process was really good for the company.

But already having the cited, the steps, I think

Pod: ordinary, open. And as I said before, courageous, answer to that question about, and I really appreciate that because I’ve seen so many times leaders staying too long in roles for a range of reasons know. Often fear-based as in, I haven’t got somewhere else to go to, or, I can still do this cause they still need me or whatever the answer is.

So for you to sit there and realize I’m not as passionate about this role as I have been, and indeed, maybe I’m no longer the right press put as role. I don’t think it’s extraordinary courageous place to come to, or importantly, the way you. Helped your successor to come on board. and then take a sabbatical is a, it’s a great place to be.

My experience is people who take sabbaticals are usually either from artistic type backgrounds, musicians, artists, et cetera, or academic type backgrounds. Leaders often don’t do this yet. Yet. It is a really great process to pause, rest, rejuvenate, and come back into the world with a fresh perspective, which is what you’ve done.

Eduardo: I’ve met a few other people doing sabbatical. And I realized there’s this idea of a long-term trip that is quite attractive to a lot of people. People tend to think that it’s very expensive. One of the interesting insights is you spend less money traveling. Like I did. Then we actually live in, so of course you’re not making money.

Then the guest flow is negative only, but I can spend less money. I think the courage for people is something that would push people for just making the most out of life, just rethinking life and making sure that. Whatever you do, you’re passionate about you really want to do it. And the sabbatical was a great way to

Pod: so you’ve come back into the world. you’ve joined a Brazilian startup organization. you’ve moved to Portugal to help expand that organization into his first country overseas. Tell us more.

Eduardo: So after 10 months or realizing. The energy out of the trip, the excitement for the new country was diminishing and we’re feeling more like we need to saddle where’s the anchor that we lower the anchor.

And then going back to Brazil was a good thing. But we had decided that not living in Brazil anymore was Charlie. We’re going to be. And then we started specing living in the country where at that time, which is Portugal, we actually stopped first thought of doing this in Italy. And then in Portsmouth, I got stronger.

And then I saw that maybe if I were to look for a job in Portugal, the country might not have as much opportunities for somebody with my profile. And then I also looked into Spain and began actually doing job interviews and networking with people through different sites and having conversations. And then I had a dinner at the house over the next boss from Google, and we just chatted about this.

And then he connected me to this startup. When I found four different colleagues from Google for investing in the startup and he just made the connection because he has been talking to them as well. And it really clicked what they wanted us to help. Sure open a tech hub, meaning an office to have tech talent to build technology for Brazil.

There isn’t. This is just the Pelham for when Brazil is the finishing. There’s just so much investment. So much people doing great stuff in tech is diminishing and then opening new talent pools is a good thing. Because for Brazilians at this point, coming to Europe is a natural green, both from the political perspective, from the economy perspective, from the violence perspective.

But a lot of people want to come here, but coming to Portugal is hard. And then having your Brazilian company. In Portugal is a great way to attract some of those talents because we really care about diversity. We don’t want to be a isolated group of Brazilians doing stuff in Portugal. So we’ve been hiring also intensely for Portuguese people, Europeans, overall.

Starting to get Indians in the fray because they also like it. Honestly, if there’s a Martian that speaks some English

Pod: is his effort hard to become a tech hub in Europe and developing a lot of incentives for companies like yours to go in and operate from Portico.

Eduardo: Yep. I think several countries have been thinking about this. I think work’s going to be a specialty. Good job. Being, working to a mechanism called tech visa will help people from that background come and work here.

And honestly, the country is great. The amount of days of sun in Portugal is almost legendary. People in Europe really understand this well. So the idea that you can come and live in a place with great weather and where the cost of living is not so high and have a very nice lifestyle and still work with something you’re passionate about.

it’s been a really easy pitch to deliver to candidates. We’re also thinking of. Side of this, which is the actual international expansion for logging. And I’m also, I think the previous CEO mindset really helps me on this because on the one hand there’s tech, but there’s also financial role in investment and a lot of people.

And if we do get to open operations here, It resembles a little bit more of the old job in balancing different functions, which I’m very comfortable with. And then the key question is can we be position in a strategic way in Europe because our strengths will keep working here in Brazil. I think helping the company answer that question is something I can really help with.

And if that works then coming to Europe and maybe other companies, something that I try.

Pod: So from a leadership perspective, Eduardo, you’re in Portugal, you’re heading up, as you said, not just the product side, but the various parts of the organization as it expands in Portugal. And then across a year from there, what are some of the leadership, learnings or insights you’re taking from your role in Catho or indeed your role in Google before Catho to bring into this role?

Eduardo: I think my own passion about. Big shingles is something that there’s the self-learning had passed away. When the speed of transformation, the managed my passion was not there. The speed log is going through is we are growing 400% a year or a year, so it’s almost sad. It’s a neck breaking speed. It’s a really strong speed.

I learned to relate to that. and I’m learning to cope with this in such a way that I can have a well balanced lifestyle and deliberate, great results within that environment. I think that is the mix between the two experiences. I think the other thing that really came from Castro and so much strategy learning is asking important questions.

And I think I’m helping the loyalty team goes through some of those. Of course, some of them are really well answered, but figuring out how do we deal with a lot of the challenges that we had? Are we positioning ourselves as a costlier? Are you going to be the fastest company delivering parcels? What role do we want the gig economy to have within us?

Is this the only approach we can take it? I think there are several strong questions running around and I think it can bring a lot of insights from those.

Pod: So for a hundred percent, a year on year, that’s a super Sonic speed growth that’s beyond scaling. How does a leader stay abreast of themselves in terms of their own ability to be ahead of the curve from a leadership point of view?

So you don’t slow down that growth. as in, don’t start down by mistake.

Eduardo: It is hard. I think there was a mix between choosing some areas and in those making sure that you help leaders in those areas think well about what they’re doing, choosing which areas are not going understanding the detail because there’s just too much going on.

And creating a good trust within the exact group so that in whatever you’re not doing, you are comfortable, somebody is doing, and this is really needed. And you’re going to hear about it. So choosing your battles, choosing where to put your energy, I think is key and focusing on people. Of course, if other people will be struggling with that speed.

Helping them specially find expectations. Especially more junior people would have an expectation of, I need to learn everything that’s going on. it hasn’t happened yet, so maybe I need to put more effort into this. It’s just a bad mindset to be in because there’ll be suppressed or dying. So helping people cope with this and getting them cleared.

Areas of scope to work with and assured them within the state, they can be great employees.

Pod: Are you planning your next sabbatical yet?

Eduardo: But when we first landed in Portugal, I had the discussion with the family that, okay, let’s do this every four years. I would just find out this new thing. And then we weren’t.

So this, and then I travel again. But I think what we were learning after renting the first house and all discuss, buying a house for us. Emotions of not having a place might not work as well when the kids are older. I think the agent’s ritual was probably especially strong, but let’s see. maybe take another break would make sense.

Pod: Fantastic. I’ve taken a sabbatical myself twice in my career, the last time being within the last 12 months. And I can absolutely verify you come back refreshed with fresh points of view each time that I’ve done it, at least so I can sit. I can certainly see Hawaii. Loved it and why you’ve benefited from it

coming to the end of our conversation. I’ve got two questions for you that I ended up all of my interviews with given the wisdom you’ve accumulated, particularly in the last 12 months year, have your sabbatical, what would you now be telling the 35 year old version of you

Eduardo: that is so hard? I think one message.

And I would like to get through, as things are gonna work out, don’t get as anxious on the other hand. I think if I were, if I identify I’ve listened to this too much, maybe it wouldn’t work as hard as, and then things would turned out badly. But I think we all have, I think, especially with the pandemic, I think our brain has this tendency to writers.

Think everything’s going to go wrong, where I go to die. Or this is just an illusion nothing’s going to happen. I think those are like flaws in the brain. And I think that is really in the big screen. So putting your energy in understanding the details and where to get things, I think this is what I’d like my twenty-five new version to do more course.

There’s some days I’m just the wrong person for the job. And I Sri myself that I could really do the job well. I seen for something. I would like to have at that point, or I heard this a few times for a few different people, but I would like to have was more depth. And this the other one is just especially thinking about capital 40 more energy in figuring out what are really the key elements for the company.

I think there was less understanding. Of what means the company be as good as it was, and even less about what were the steps I have since the market was changing so much. I think putting more energy in those questions I think would have made things improve faster and more in the right direction.

Pod: Brilliant. And I remember having dinner with you in Sao Paulo once where we ended up discussing music over red wine. What would, while I remember what you said at the time, but what is your memory now of your favorite band or your favorite song?

Eduardo: We did this great exercise in the family because birthdays were really getting hard with a, grown-up having so many people over and then it would begin this joke and reach each future birthday.

You. Which was a song and the assembling would record that. or pieces of the song. And then one of the words they give to each watch that they knew for the family. And then people usually the same nights States. And this last August, when I turned 44 and the son was a Brazilian West. So it’s a bit hard for you to relate to it, but it’s from a guy called  station.

And the key element is I’d rather be the cost of metamorphoses. Then you’ll have a very specific opinion about everything. I can really relate to that message today.

Pod: So you’d like to be in a constant metamorphosis, then stuck in one specific opinion in our point of view. Fantastic. you certainly having met him more advisees yourself are changing or evolving, adapting, whatever the right word is, going from Brazil to California, back to that, around the world and out to Portugal.

Fantastic Ivana, fantastic. To catch up with you again, it’s been far too long. I love to hear that you’ve done that sabbatical and more importantly, the end of you and the family have had a huge benefit from it. And you’re bringing that into your next role. Thank you for sharing that with us today.

can we take from that in conversation with Eduardo? For me, there’s four things that stood out that I’ve been thinking about since I spoke to him on the line to Lisbon. One is the benefit of a sabbatical. I know I mentioned in my interview with him, I’ve taken two in my own career and each time. Take the idea of taking it was one of trepidation and nervousness and coming out of it, it was one of absolute gratitude and feeling of refreshment and regeneration of ideas and indie creativity.

It is difficult when you are in a corporate life to consider taking a sabbatical yet outside of corporate life, it happens regularly, both in the artistic industry and in the academic industry. So I was certainly encourage any leader who was feeling tarred, burned out, even considering whether they’re in the right role or not to look at the idea of a sabbatical to take the family away for a while to enjoy it.

To generate new perspectives and to come back feeling refreshed and generating new opportunities for you.

The second one that struck me talking to Eduardo was the idea of learning to lead others who are technically very strong. And indeed they know they’re very strong and they know they have expertise in their function that you, as their leader may never have. So how do you as a leader offer value? the first step is to not try to over engineer reasons for you to be a good leader that rarely works.

The second step is to find out what are the leavers in their function that you need to understand? So you can ask powerful and guiding questions of them to help them decide parts of their role or parts of the function that might need your help with. The second thing with that is to look at what’s the broader culture you’re trying to co-create across your team and how do you help them in that regard?

And third, of course, which is normal for any leadership role is how do you break down barriers, open doors, or clear the way for them to be as good as they can be, or to have decisions made for them or to enable their work.

Eduardo: Okay.

Pod: the thing is communicating with confidence. Eduardo talked about his learning, having come out of Google, where his role was to experiment and move into areas that there was a lot of ambiguity about and being comfortable with that. So when he moved into his role as CEO of catheter and had over a thousand people in his building, addressing them with a sense of ambiguity didn’t work.

And so his learning was when is a time to communicate that we are now experimenting and we don’t know where we’re going first is when as a time to communicate in order to instill certainty. And indeed during times like a pandemic, when there is no certainty, what can you communicate to give certainty?

Such as jobs will be safe, or we are here to help our people or whatever information you can actually relay that will give a sense of certainty. So the question I suppose, for the leader is what is the scenario in front of me or what type of communication is needed from me in this scenario? Is it to encourage experimentation with a lack of understanding of what we might achieve or indeed is a certainty.

And how do I achieve that? Thank you for listening to another episode of the leadership diet. We hope you enjoyed it. Head over to www.thatisshoulddiet.com, where you can subscribe to the podcast, to our blogs and retrieve the show notes. From each episode, every show knows, has links to whatever resources were mentioned by our guests, including their favorite song or band.

And the best way you can support this podcast is by subscribing and sharing it with your colleagues and friends. So they can hear the insights from our guests as well. Thank you.

Or download as a PDF: